Medication Administration Errors With G-tube Potassium and Tramadol
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a G-tube received potassium chloride in the manner ordered. The resident had diagnoses including attention to G-tube, ileus, hypokalemia, and GERD, and was documented as lacking decision-making capacity and being totally dependent for ADLs. During a medication pass observation, an LVN prepared potassium chloride oral solution 20 mEq/15 ml, 30 ml for administration via G-tube and then administered the medication undiluted, flushing with only small amounts of water between medications. The resident’s order specified that the 40 mEq dose was to be diluted with 4 oz of water prior to administration. The record review showed the resident’s care plan addressed G-tube feeding, aspiration risk, GI distress, and serum potassium variation, and the facility’s own documentation and manufacturer information indicated the potassium chloride should be diluted before use. The LVN stated the medication was not mixed with 4 oz of water as ordered and should have been. The DON reviewed the manufacturer’s label and the resident’s prescription labeling, which also indicated the medication should be diluted, and stated it needed to be diluted to flush through the G-tube easily and to prevent erosion of the gastric lining. The facility also failed to follow the physician’s order for tramadol for another resident with dementia, diabetes, hypertension, and long-term opiate use who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent for all ADLs. The order directed tramadol 50 mg via G-tube twice daily for severe pain 7 to 10, and to hold if drowsy or RR was less than 12. During observation, the LVN administered tramadol without checking the resident’s RR and while the resident stated he was not in pain. Record review showed the MAR documented pain as 0 for multiple scheduled tramadol doses, which was outside the ordered pain parameter, and the resident received tramadol 17 times with pain documented as 0. The pharmacy label also did not include the physician’s hold parameters, and the pharmacist stated those parameters should have been included.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.