Cold Meals Served Below Required Hot-Holding Temperatures
Summary
Food was not maintained at palatable hot-holding temperatures for multiple meals, with survey observations and resident interviews showing that hot items were frequently served cold or below the facility’s stated temperature standard. The facility policy for Monitoring Temperatures of Cooked Foods required TCS cooked foods to be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or higher, but survey testing found several items below that level, including pureed meats at 120 degrees F, pureed tomatoes at 120 degrees F and 105 degrees F, fried steak at 122 degrees F, and chopped meat at 115 degrees F. During a breakfast tray test, eggs measured 102 degrees F, a biscuit 100 degrees F, sausage 99 degrees F, and grits 120 degrees F; the grits were warm, but the sausage and eggs were cold to the palate. Residents reported ongoing concerns that meals were cold, especially breakfast. Two residents stated that food was cold even when trays were delivered promptly, and one resident said staff told him they were not allowed to heat the food. The resident also stated the issue had been brought up repeatedly in resident council and that staff said they would fix it but never did. During the resident council meeting, multiple residents voiced that meals were frequently served cold and that coffee was often cold by the time it was received. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that hot foods should be served at 135 to 140 degrees F and confirmed that the tested breakfast items did not meet that range. He also stated that complaints about cold food had been received about three months earlier and that the facility’s heating equipment had not changed. The Administrator stated that hot foods should be served at 135 degrees F and that serving food at improper temperatures could lead to palatability issues and possible nutritional problems such as weight loss. The affected residents had intact cognition, with diagnoses including cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and one resident was on a mechanical soft diet with regular texture and regular liquids while the other was on a low concentrated sweets diet with regular texture and regular liquids.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.