Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse and Neglect
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from verbal abuse and neglect, and the investigation findings identified failures involving four residents. The facility’s abuse policy stated residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect, and neglect was defined as failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The cited concerns involved Resident 78, Resident 131, Resident 94, and Resident 37, all of whom were reviewed for abuse and neglect concerns related to staff actions and delays in care. Resident 94, who was cognitively intact and on the 200 hallway, reported that while waiting for staff, they accidentally wet their pants and were told staff were caring for another resident. The facility later substantiated neglect and acknowledged the delay was related to staffing. Resident 37, who was cognitively intact and recently hospitalized for joint replacement surgery, reported going 2 to 3 hours without a brief change, and the facility substantiated neglect. Resident 131, who was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, reported that it took two hours for a CNA to answer the call light after an incontinent episode; the facility later substantiated neglect and documented that abrupt staffing changes created delays in care delivery. Resident 78, who was cognitively intact, reported that an unfamiliar CNA abruptly pulled back the covers, laughed, refused assistance, told the resident to change herself, and ordered her to go to the bathroom despite the resident stating she was a check-and-change resident and could not adequately cleanse herself or fasten the brief tabs. The roommate corroborated that the CNA spoke harshly and treated Resident 78 like she was nothing. The resident reported feeling like she did not deserve assistance, and the record showed no documentation of the incident, no assessment or monitoring for psychosocial impact, and no entry in the incident log. The grievance was initially categorized as a customer service interaction, and the facility later substantiated verbal abuse even though the CNA suspended by the facility did not match the resident’s description of the alleged perpetrator and the alleged perpetrator had not been identified at the time of survey.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.