Infection Control Failures in Hand Hygiene, EBP, and TB Screening
Summary
The facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. During lunch service, a CNA was observed assisting residents in the dining room while wearing gloves and touching multiple surfaces and residents without changing the gloves. Another CNA delivered meal trays to residents, repositioned a resident in a recliner, exited the room without performing hand hygiene, and then picked up another tray and entered a second resident’s room. The same CNA was also observed delivering a tray, opening crackers for a resident, and moving a resident in a wheelchair without performing hand hygiene. The DON stated that staff should perform hand hygiene anytime they touch a patient or the patient’s personal space, should change gloves after assisting a patient, and should perform hand hygiene after exiting a resident room after delivering a meal tray. Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not being implemented as ordered for residents with indwelling medical devices. One resident had a urinary catheter and a care plan intervention for EBP, yet no EBP sign or PPE was observed at the room. Another resident with diagnoses including hydronephrosis, ureteral stricture, presence of urogenital implants, and UTI had an order for EBP due to a wound or indwelling medical device, but PPE was not observed at the room and the resident stated staff do not wear gowns when providing care. A third resident with infection and inflammatory reaction due to an indwelling urethral catheter, UTI, and sepsis also had EBP orders and a care plan intervention, but no PPE was observed at the room. Staff interviews reflected inconsistent understanding of EBP requirements, including when to use gowns, gloves, and masks, and one RN was observed in a resident’s room without a gown or mask while administering eye drops and adjusting the catheter bag. The facility’s TB screening process for new admissions was inaccurate because the PPD testing solution was stored in a medication refrigerator that was below the manufacturer’s required temperature range. The refrigerator thermometer was observed at 32.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and the temperature logs for the month showed 25 of 25 days documented between 32 and 35.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The Aplisol manufacturer instructions stated it should be stored at 36 to 46 degrees Fahrenheit and not frozen, and that improper storage may result in loss of potency and inaccurate test results. The DON stated the temperatures were too low and that if the PPD solution was compromised, TB skin test results would be inaccurate. Staff stated that new admissions received two-step TB skin testing and that the PPD solution in the medication refrigerator was the only solution available in the facility.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.