Delayed Call Light Response and Ineffective Grievance Process
Summary
The facility failed to ensure prompt response to call lights and timely provision of needed cares and services for four residents identified in the report. One resident stated she sometimes waited an hour for staff to come help her in her room, including assistance with repositioning and incontinent care, and said she would remain soaking wet with burning in her peri-area until help arrived. Another resident reported that staff did not answer call lights, that she had to wait after using the bathroom because she could not put on a new incontinent product by herself, and that she had sat on the toilet for 25 minutes waiting for staff. A resident council meeting also documented complaints from two residents that call light response times were 30 minutes and 45 minutes. Staff interviews showed that the expected response time was much shorter than what residents reported. An LPN and a CNA each stated call lights should be answered in no more than five minutes, and the DON stated residents should not wait longer than five to ten minutes. The AD said the call light delays had been a consistent concern and described seeing a resident wait 15 to 20 minutes with the call light on before staff arrived. The administrator acknowledged that call light wait time grievances were a trend and that audits had been increased, while the SSD also identified extended call light wait times as a grievance trend. Record review supported the residents’ reports of delayed response times. The facility’s call light system did not track location or timing information for activations or response times. Call light audits from November 2025 through April 2026 included multiple response times over five minutes, including 10 minutes and 37 seconds, 17 minutes and 32 seconds, and 36 minutes and 16 seconds, with some required audits missing. Resident council minutes from October 2025 through March 2026 repeatedly documented concerns about call light wait times. The grievance review showed that 9 of 44 grievances were related to long wait times, and the grievance process was not effective because residents did not know how to file grievances, where forms were located, or how to file anonymously. The grievance forms were kept in a wall organizer by the nurses station that the SSD and administrator believed was not accessible to residents in wheelchairs, there was no drop box for anonymous submission, and several grievance records lacked documentation of notification, written communication preference, or satisfaction with the resolution.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Grievance Information Not Posted or Accessible: The facility failed to provide 7 confidential residents with accessible information on how to file grievances or concerns. During Resident Council, residents stated they did not know they could file grievances anonymously and had not seen the grievance procedure posted in prominent locations. Surveyors observed the lobby postings did not include the grievance policy, filing instructions, or where to obtain a form, while the ADM stated forms were available near the staff break room and could be submitted anonymously in the same box as blank forms.
A facility failed to ensure grievance forms available at one of the grievance information locations included wording that a grievance could be filed anonymously. Although the grievance policy stated complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously, the policy/procedure was not posted at the Willow Unit location, and the grievance forms there did not mention anonymous filing. The NHA confirmed the omission.
Failure to Resolve Representative’s Grievance About Morphine Use: A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, severe cognitive impairment, a pressure ulcer, and hospice services had a care plan meeting where her RP said morphine made her sedated and confused, asked that he be notified before any MS was given, and requested routine acetaminophen instead. The request was not entered as a grievance, was not documented in the resident’s record, and staff later gave MS without notifying the RP. Interviews showed the MDS Coordinator and DON did not follow up on the complaint, and the grievance log had no entry for the resident.
Delayed Follow-Up on Missing Dentures: A resident with Alzheimer’s disease and severe cognitive impairment was observed eating without teeth after missing dentures were not followed up on timely. The SSD was first notified by family that the dentures were missing, but did not pursue the issue with the dental consultant for more than a month. The resident’s SLP noted the resident took longer to chew food because the resident did not have teeth.
Failure to File and Investigate Resident Grievance: A resident reported that a CNA made a false statement after he helped his roommate following a fall, but the concern was not filed as a grievance or investigated. The grievance log only showed an unrelated grievance about inconsistent care, and the SS Director stated she did not complete a grievance because that was not how grievances worked; the ADON and DON stated the grievance should have been filed and investigated.
A resident’s family grievance about staff not waking the resident and getting him out of bed was not documented or investigated, despite the administrator speaking with the family member. In a separate issue, a cognitively intact resident reported that clothing packed during an evacuation was missing after return to the facility, and the missing items were not satisfactorily resolved; staff searched for the bag, but it was not found and the administrator acknowledged the facility was responsible for the clothing.
Grievance Information Not Posted or Accessible
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide information to residents and their representatives about how to file grievances or concerns for 7 of 15 confidential residents. During Resident Council on 08/12/2026 at 11:00am, 7 confidential residents stated they did not know they could file a grievance anonymously and had not seen a posting of the grievance procedure in prominent locations. The residents attending the council stated there was no system for submitting a grievance anonymously, and all 7 residents had lived in the facility for more than 6 months. On 08/12/2026 at 1:45pm, surveyors observed the prominent postings in the lobby area and found no grievance policy, no instructions for filing a grievance, and no directions for where a grievance form was available. On 08/13/2026 at 11:30am, the ADM stated she was the grievance officer, that grievance forms were available down a hallway by the staff break room, and that residents could anonymously leave completed forms in the same box as the empty forms. The ADM also stated grievances were assigned to department heads, were intended to be resolved within 5 days, and were documented on the original grievance form, which was kept in a notebook for 3 years. The facility's grievance policy, revised January 2017, stated residents and representatives could file grievances orally, in writing, or anonymously, and that a copy of the grievance/complaint procedure was to be posted on the resident bulletin board.
Grievance Information Missing Anonymous Filing Option
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that grievance forms could be filed anonymously in one of four locations where grievance information was available, specifically on the Willow Unit. The facility policy on grievances, last reviewed 3/1/26, stated that grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously. However, during an observation on 8/4/26 at 8:04 a.m., the grievance policy/procedure was not posted at the location on the [NAME] Unit, and the grievance forms available at the grievance box location did not include wording stating that a grievance form can be filed anonymously. During an interview on 8/6/26 at 3:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility grievance policy and procedure failed to provide information on residents' right to file a grievance anonymously.
Failure to Resolve Representative’s Grievance About Morphine Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve a grievance voiced by a resident’s representative during a care plan meeting. The resident was a 92-year-old female with Alzheimer’s disease, anemia, a pressure ulcer of the right heel, severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 3, and hospice services. Her care plan addressed chronic pain and included analgesia as ordered, with evaluation of pain interventions each shift and as needed. Her physician orders included acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 hours as needed and morphine sulfate 15 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain. During the care plan conference, the resident’s representative stated that narcotic medication caused the resident to become sedated and confused, requested that morphine sulfate not be given unless he was first notified, and asked to add routine acetaminophen to help with repositioning and reduce the need for morphine. The conference note reflected that hospice would be contacted for orders. However, the resident’s record did not contain documentation that the representative’s request to be notified before morphine administration was entered into the medical record, and the facility grievance log for that month had no entry for the resident. The resident later received morphine sulfate once, and the medical record did not show that the representative was notified before administration. Staff interviews showed the RN was unaware of any instruction to call the family before giving morphine, the MDS Coordinator stated the representative’s complaints during the care plan meeting should have been translated into a grievance and followed up on but were not, and the DON stated she did not follow up on the complaints voiced during the meeting. The facility grievance policy stated that residents have the right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and that the facility must make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Delayed Follow-Up on Missing Dentures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that one resident’s missing dentures were followed up with the dental consultant in a timely manner. The resident had Alzheimer’s disease with late onset, lacked the capacity to understand and make decisions, and had severe cognitive impairment on the MDS dated 7/2/2026. The resident also required substantial to maximal assistance with ADLs, including bathing, dressing, rolling, and transferring. On 7/23/2026, the resident was observed eating in the dining room without teeth. The speech therapy evaluation dated 6/29/2026 indicated that because the resident did not have teeth, the resident took longer to chew food. The social services director stated she was first made aware by the resident’s family member on 6/16/2026 that the dentures were missing, but did not follow up on the dentures until 7/23/2026, more than one month later. The resident had a dental evaluation on 6/23/2026, but it did not indicate whether the resident was seen for dentures. The social services director stated the delay was not acceptable and that the denture referral was not followed up timely.
Failure to File and Investigate Resident Grievance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident’s concern about a CNA’s false statement was treated as a grievance and investigated for one of three reviewed residents. Resident #8 stated that after he assisted his roommate following a fall, a CNA later said he had not helped her, and he reported this concern to the Social Services Director. The resident said no one investigated his allegation, and after he spoke with Social Services, he was asked whether he wanted to transfer because he was unhappy with the facility. He stated that he did not want to transfer and wanted to remain at the facility. Review of the grievance log showed a grievance filed by Resident #8 on 4/8/2026 concerning inconsistent care, but there was no grievance related to the staff member’s false statement. The Social Services Director stated she was not aware of any grievance other than the April grievance and said she did not fill out a grievance because that is not how grievances work. The ADON stated she did not know why a grievance was not filed and that it should have been. The DON stated that a grievance should have been filed, investigated, and followed up in writing.
Failure to Document Grievance and Resolve Missing Clothing Complaint
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident’s grievance was documented and promptly investigated after the resident’s responsible party called to complain that staff were not waking the resident and getting him out of bed. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting his left non-dominant side, polyneuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, insomnia, pain, and peripheral vascular disease. The responsible party stated she called the facility and spoke with a nurse about the concern, and later spoke with the administrator about the same issue. Interviews with the DON and SSD confirmed there was no documentation of the complaint. The administrator confirmed he spoke with the responsible party after her call, but he did not document the grievance and the facility did not investigate it. The facility’s grievance policy stated grievances were to be documented and thoroughly investigated, with prompt efforts to resolve them. The facility also failed to satisfactorily resolve a grievance involving a resident’s missing clothing after evacuation to a sister facility. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis, and chronic pain, reported that a bag containing three days of clothing was missing after she returned to the facility. She stated the missing clothing included items she needed and preferred to wear, and that she remained without those clothes for about a month after returning. The grievance record showed staff checked the laundry room, spoke with housekeeping, and searched other closets, but the bag and clothing were not found. Interviews confirmed the clothing had been packed for evacuation, was not returned with the resident, and may have been left at the sister facility or lost in transfer. The administrator acknowledged it was the facility’s responsibility to ensure the clothing was packed and returned, and stated he should have replaced the resident’s clothing.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.