Failure to Provide Timely Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Care
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate pressure ulcer care and pressure relief measures for two residents who were at risk for, or already had, pressure ulcers. The report cites 10 NYCRR 415.12(c)(1) and describes that the facility did not ensure necessary treatment and services were provided consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Resident #64 was admitted with existing Stage 2 and Stage 3 pressure ulcers and was dependent for all activities of daily living, including bed mobility. The admission MDS documented that the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and had pressure reducing devices for bed and chair, was on a turning and repositioning schedule, and received ointments and medications. However, the record showed no documented evidence that the comprehensive care plan included pressure reducing devices or pressure relief interventions until after the resident returned from a hospital stay. On readmission, the resident had moisture associated skin damage on the left buttock and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacrum. Later treatment observation showed a coccyx pressure ulcer, blister-type areas on the sacral area, and an open wound in the gluteal fold with yellowish and white tissue. Resident #24 had diagnoses including right hip fracture, intellectual disabilities, and seizures, and the MDS identified the resident as at risk for pressure ulcers with an unhealed Stage 3 pressure ulcer and use of a pressure reducing device for the chair. The care plan initially addressed only monitoring and documenting skin changes. The resident developed a large deflated blister on the right heel that progressed to a ruptured blister, then a Stage 2 pressure ulcer, and later a Stage 3 pressure ulcer. Survey observations showed the resident sitting in a wheelchair with black surgical boots or ortho shoes and both feet on the floor, and there was no heel suspension boot in the room during one observation. Staff interviews indicated the resident had not had individualized pressure ulcer prevention interventions in place on admission, that heel suspension boots were initiated later, and that the resident’s family had brought in surgical boots from home. The DON stated there were not any specific individualized care plans initiated for the resident to prevent pressure ulcers upon admission and that the interventions on the care plan were not 100% appropriate or effective, as the resident developed a pressure ulcer.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.