Failure to Provide Proper Urinary, Perineal, and Catheter Care and Education
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide appropriate urinary care, resident education, and infection control practices for multiple residents with UTIs, incontinence, and indwelling urinary catheters. One cognitively intact resident with diabetes, morbid obesity, and frequent bowel and bladder incontinence had a history of recurrent UTIs with positive urine cultures for E. coli and pseudomonas and had been treated with antibiotics on multiple occasions. Staff reported that this resident preferred to toilet independently and required stand-by assistance, and an LPN stated that staff had educated her on wiping from front to back. However, review of the care plan, progress notes, and infection control documentation showed no evidence that the resident had been educated on appropriate toileting procedures. The DON confirmed there was no record of such education, that the resident toileted herself, and that the IDT did not conduct root cause analyses for infections. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment, end stage renal disease, obstructive uropathy, and an indwelling urinary catheter had recently been treated with antibiotics for a UTI. During observed catheter care, two CNAs donned gowns and gloves and brought supplies into the room, but then repeatedly touched environmental surfaces and items such as the bed control device, a disposable water cup, the over-bed table, and the resident’s phone while wearing the same gloves. They then continued to provide perineal and catheter-related care without changing gloves, contrary to infection control practices that require glove changes after contact with inanimate objects before continuing direct care. A third cognitively intact resident, always incontinent of bowel and bladder and requiring substantial assistance for toileting hygiene, reported frequent UTIs and receiving bed baths, usually voiding in her brief rather than using a bedpan. During one observed episode of incontinence care, a CNA wiped the center of the resident’s perineal area from front to back and then back to front with a single wipe without turning it, then used another wipe for the leg creases, and the staff did not separate the resident’s legs to visualize and clean the folds of the labia. This technique did not follow the facility’s perineal care policy, which requires separating the labia, washing the urethral area first, wiping from front to back using a clean area of the washcloth with each stroke, and not reusing the same area of the cloth. In a separate observation with the same resident, another CNA demonstrated correct technique, including separating the labia, wiping front to back with clean portions of the cloth, and changing gloves after touching room surfaces, and later described this as the expected procedure, highlighting that the earlier care did not conform to policy. A fourth cognitively intact resident with vascular dementia, obstructive uropathy, and a long-term indwelling urinary catheter was repeatedly observed sitting in a recliner with the urinary catheter drainage bag hanging from a trash can beside the chair. On one occasion, the bag, partially covered by a dignity cover, was resting on the floor. The DON acknowledged that the bag should not have been hanging on the trash can and moved it, and a QMA stated that staff typically hung the bag where it “needed to be,” while another CNA reported that she always hung the bag on the trash can because that was the resident’s preference. The resident had a history of penile pain, edema, and a tear to the penis associated with the catheter, with purulent, bloody, and malodorous drainage documented in progress notes and treated with antibiotics. During observed catheter care, CNAs noted a tear at the bottom of the penis and a moderate amount of green drainage in the brief, which they stated had been present for a couple of days. The care plan included an intervention not to allow any part of the drainage system to touch the floor, but also documented the resident’s preference to have the catheter bag hanging on the trash can. The clinical record and care plan lacked documentation that the resident had been educated on the risks of hanging the catheter bag on the trash can or that specific interventions addressing this practice were in place prior to the survey. The DON later stated that the facility did not have a policy specifically addressing urinary catheter bags touching objects and confirmed that the resident’s care plan was updated to include the trash-can hanging preference only after she personally observed the bag on the trash can during the survey. The ADON reported that staff had previously called her about a laceration to the resident’s penis and that the resident frequently adjusted his catheter himself, and she stated that staff should be monitoring the resident’s skin during catheter care each shift. The nurse practitioner indicated that a penile tear would likely be due to catheter pulling but was unsure of the exact cause. Overall, the survey findings documented failures to follow the facility’s own perineal care policy, inconsistent adherence to infection control practices during catheter and incontinence care, and lack of documented resident education and care planning related to toileting and catheter management for residents with recurrent UTIs and indwelling catheters.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.