Failure to Report and Investigate Suspected Resident-to-Resident Sexual Abuse
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to timely report and investigate an allegation of sexual abuse involving two residents, despite existing policies requiring immediate reporting of suspected abuse. One resident (R3) was an elderly female with unspecified dementia, terminal cerebral atherosclerosis on hospice care, severe cognitive impairment, nonverbal status, and total dependence on staff for ADLs. Another resident (R2) was an elderly male with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, cerebral infarction, and a documented history of sexually inappropriate behaviors and poor impulse control per psychiatry and progress notes. The facility’s abuse policy required staff, as mandatory reporters, to immediately report suspected physical or sexual abuse, including resident‑to‑resident incidents, to the Administrator and appropriate authorities within specified time frames. On the morning of 03/24/26, CNA V7 assisted R3 with breakfast, then laid her back in bed, applied a new brief, and ensured it was secured tightly, noting that R3 could not loosen or remove the brief herself due to her decline. About 15 minutes later, while walking past R3’s room, V7 looked in and observed R2 up against R3’s bed rail. V7 yelled at R2 that he was not supposed to be in the room. As R2 stepped away, V7 saw his hand inside the front of R3’s brief and then saw him remove his hand; she then entered, removed R2 from the room, and noted that R3’s brief, previously secured tightly, was now loose. V8, the MDS Coordinator, heard the CNA yell, came to the room, and took R2 away. V7 later confirmed that R3 had been positioned on her back and that she saw R2 remove his hand from the front of R3’s brief when she yelled at him. Despite witnessing this event, V7 did not report the incident as abuse or suspected sexual abuse to the Administrator or other supervisory staff. V7 stated she assumed others knew what had happened because V8 removed R2 from the room and the Administrator later moved R2 to a different room, and she acknowledged she did not tell anyone and that no one asked her questions about the incident. V8 reported only that R2 had been found in R3’s room and removed, and the Administrator and other leadership stated that nothing was reported to them that, in their view, justified making a reportable allegation to the state survey agency at that time. The facility’s own abuse prevention policy required prompt investigation and reporting of suspected abuse, including resident‑to‑resident incidents that could cause mental anguish, and specified that anyone suspecting criminal sexual abuse against a resident without decision‑making capacity must immediately report it to the Administrator and DON and that the Administrator must notify state survey, APS, law enforcement, and the Ombudsman within two hours if abuse is suspected. These requirements were not followed in response to the observed incident between R2 and R3. Additional documentation showed that R2 had a known history of sexually inappropriate behavior prior to this event. A psychiatry note from 08/18/25 documented follow‑up for impulsivity and inappropriate sexual behaviors, and a 03/30/26 progress note described ongoing behavioral dysregulation with inappropriate sexual behaviors, poor impulse control, boundary violations, and hypersexual actions including inappropriate touching of staff, requiring increased supervision. However, R2’s care plan did not include any problem, goal, or interventions related to sexually inappropriate behaviors. On 04/02/26, when questioned about the incident with R3, R2 stated he had sexually assaulted her and admitted to touching her inappropriately, though he later denied knowing her during the facility’s internal investigation. Staff interviews indicated that R2 had been wandering and entering rooms, including R3’s, and that he had been moved between units due to behaviors, but staff and administration did not treat the 03/24/26 event as a reportable allegation of sexual abuse at the time it occurred. The surveyors determined that Immediate Jeopardy began on 03/24/26 in the morning when R2, with known sexually inappropriate behavior, was seen with his hand in R3’s brief and staff did not report the incident.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.