Failure to Conduct Impartial Abuse Investigation and Protect Resident from Alleged Abuser
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation of an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse and to maintain the original witness documentation. A cognitively impaired resident with multiple diagnoses, including dementia with psychotic disturbance, anxiety, major depressive disorder, chronic pain, hemiplegia, and legal blindness, alleged that a CNA had hurt her. The resident’s care plan identified her as a vulnerable adult with a history of significant trauma and financial abuse/exploitation, and noted that she was a trauma survivor requiring 24‑hour care. The care plan also documented that she could exhibit manipulative behavior and make accusations related to her dementia and anxiety, and included an intervention for two staff to be present during care in her room and during showers. Multiple CNA students reported witnessing or hearing about physical abuse of the resident by a CNA. One student stated she saw the CNA hit the resident’s left shoulder hard with an open hand, push the shoulder forcefully into the mattress while holding the resident down, shove the resident’s knee down forcefully into the mattress, and push the right side of the resident’s body toward the wall with force, while the resident screamed that she was being hurt and asked for help. Another student stated she and another student witnessed the CNA pushing the resident on her left side using a lot of unnecessary force, pressing very hard on the resident’s shoulder while leaning over her and putting her weight onto the resident, while the resident told the CNA to stop and said she was being hurt. The students further reported that when they later assisted with feeding, the resident was sobbing, said the CNA had hurt her, tried to show where her knee hurt, and told the students not to be like the CNA. When the students reported the allegation to the wound nurse/nurse manager on duty and quality assurance staff, the investigation process was described by multiple witnesses as coercive and dismissive. The wound nurse/nurse manager repeatedly emphasized that the alleged perpetrator was a single mother who could lose her job and be unable to feed her child, which the students and the CNA student instructor described as making them feel guilty, uncomfortable, doubting themselves, and as if they were lying. The wound nurse/nurse manager interrupted the students as they tried to explain what they saw, characterized the resident as combative and behaving this way often, and asked the students to physically demonstrate on the quality assurance nurse what the CNA had done, including asking a student who had not witnessed the abuse to demonstrate. The students were asked to provide handwritten statements, which they did, but those original statements were not retained in the investigation file and later could not be located by the DON, wound nurse/nurse manager, or quality assurance nurse. The facility’s Final Abuse Investigation Report concluded that the allegation of abuse was not substantiated and described the incident only as the resident reporting to students during meal assistance that the CNA hit her, without reference to the students’ direct eyewitness accounts of physical actions by the CNA. The investigation file contained only handwritten statements from the alleged perpetrator and the CNA student instructor, and not from the student witnesses. Instead, the file included typed documents authored by the wound nurse/nurse manager and the quality assurance nurse that summarized the students’ accounts in a less aggressive manner than what the students later described in interviews, and these documents were not signed by the students. The DON stated she did not interview the resident and relied on the wound nurse/nurse manager and quality assurance nurse to do so, and she did not receive any statements with the resident’s interview. During the period after the allegation was reported and while the investigation was incomplete and unsubstantiated, staffing records showed the alleged perpetrator CNA was again assigned to provide care to the resident on two subsequent shifts. These actions and omissions—coercive and biased interviewing of witnesses, failure to obtain and preserve signed witness statements from all student witnesses, failure to interview the resident by the DON, reliance on altered or second-hand typed summaries instead of original statements, and allowing the alleged perpetrator to continue caring for the resident—constituted the facility’s failure to conduct a thorough and impartial abuse investigation and to protect the resident from further potential abuse. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation as determined by the surveyors.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.