Failure to Implement UTI Treatment Orders and Specialist Referral
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow physician orders and obtain specialist referrals for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI) in a resident with multiple comorbidities, including diabetes, Stage 5 chronic kidney disease, hypertension, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, hydrocele, and vertebral compression fracture. The resident’s MDS documented severe cognitive impairment and occasional urinary incontinence, and the care plan included monitoring and documenting signs and symptoms of UTI. On 10/01, the facility received an order from the physician’s office to obtain a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity via straight cath. On 10/02, staff were informed by the physician’s office that the resident had a UTI and that they were waiting for culture and sensitivity results before giving orders due to the resident’s CKD diagnosis. A progress note on 10/06 documented ongoing thick pale green penile discharge and that peri-care was being provided, while the resident remained alert and able to verbalize needs. The urine culture dated 10/04 showed greater than 100,000 colonies/mL of streptococcus viridans, and under the culture’s document history it was noted that the resident had pus and thick yellow/green drainage from the penis, with a question to the provider about starting antibiotics, a urology referral, and topical bacitracin. However, the resident’s October order summary contained no orders for antibiotics or bacitracin, and the medical record did not show a referral to urology. The infection control log for October did not include the urinalysis or culture results or any treatment related to the penile drainage. On 10/10, CNAs reported the resident could not move his right leg, and he was transferred to a local hospital, where records documented a small amount of purulent penile drainage and treatment with antibiotics during his stay. During interviews, the DON and the LPN/Infection Preventionist acknowledged that the urinalysis and culture results were not on the infection control log, that no treatment was documented in the facility record, and that they could not locate evidence that the bacitracin order or urology follow-up had been implemented, despite the facility’s policy requiring documentation of significant condition changes and practitioner notification.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.