Failure to Identify and Report Resident-to-Resident Verbal Abuse Allegation
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to identify and report an allegation of verbal abuse between two residents to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) as required by federal regulations and the facility’s own abuse policy. Resident 1 had an intact Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 and an active order indicating she was capable of making her own health decisions. Over several weeks, Resident 1 reported that her roommate, Resident 2, kept the television too loud and cursed at her daily. Resident 1 stated staff told her there was nothing they could do, that they could not force Resident 2 to move, and that Resident 1 could move if she did not get along with her roommate, despite Resident 1 having lived in the room for years without prior issues. Resident 1 reported feeling less than a person because staff would not move the roommate who was cursing at her and making her uncomfortable. On one occasion, Resident 1 reported to Licensed Nurse (LN 1) that Resident 2 called her a derogatory slur (“f . c .”) the previous night. LN 1 documented this in the nurse’s notes and acknowledged in interview that the words used were inappropriate and that such behavior could be considered verbal abuse. The Social Services Director (SSD) stated she had been informed at a care conference by Resident 1’s family member that the two residents were not getting along and later learned from LN 1 that Resident 2 had used curse words toward Resident 1. The family member filed a written grievance describing that Resident 2, upset about her TV not working, asked Resident 1 for the remote, was refused, and then called Resident 1 the same derogatory slur. The SSD stated that both residents were capable of making their own medical decisions and that neither had a condition causing uncontrollable speech, but she did not report the incident as abuse because she did not believe it constituted abuse. The MDS nurse stated she became aware of the incident around midday and believed the cursing constituted abuse, and she had LN 1 notify management via the facility’s charting system so the administrator could see it. The Administrator (ADM), identified as the abuse coordinator, stated he was notified of the incident but did not consider it an allegation of verbal abuse because he believed Resident 2 did not have intent. During review of the facility’s Abuse Prevention Policy, the policy defined verbal abuse as willful use of disparaging and derogatory language toward residents or their families, regardless of age or ability to comprehend, and required immediate separation of residents in patient-to-patient abuse and reporting of allegations to CDPH not later than two hours after the allegation is made. The ADM was unable to identify any reference to “intent” in the policy and acknowledged it was the facility’s policy to protect residents from verbal abuse, but he maintained that the incident was not abuse and therefore it was not reported to CDPH as required.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.