Failure to Provide Required Transfer/Discharge Notices and Ombudsman Notification
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide required transfer/discharge notices to residents and to send copies of those notices to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for multiple residents. Surveyors found that the facility relied on the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) as its only discharge/transfer notice and did not use any separate form that met regulatory content requirements. The NOMNC used by the facility did not include the effective date of transfer/discharge, the location to which the resident would be transferred or discharged, the name, address, and telephone number of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, or contact information for protection and advocacy agencies for individuals with developmental disabilities or mental disorders. Staff interviews confirmed that the Resident Relations Manager and Business Office Manager considered the NOMNC to be the facility’s discharge/transfer notice and that they did not provide ombudsman information to residents or send copies of discharge/transfer notifications to the ombudsman. For Resident #107, who had hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, systolic congestive heart failure, muscle issues, and gait and mobility abnormalities, the physician documented that the resident would transfer to another SNF at the family’s request, and a subsequent note showed the resident was discharged via transport van. The discharge MDS documented an unplanned discharge to a SNF. However, review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that a discharge notification was sent to the State Long-Term Ombudsman. The facility’s Admissions, Transfers and Discharges policy referenced reporting information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards but did not include requirements for notifying the ombudsman. For Resident #8, admitted with COPD, palliative care, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, the care plan included goals for pre-discharge planning. A discharge order and a discharge-transfer note/summary documented discharge home with oxygen equipment, home health services, narcotic medications, and a scheduled PCP appointment, and this summary was signed by the resident’s family. The documentation given to the family did not include the ombudsman’s contact information or an explanation of appeal rights. The discharge MDS showed an unplanned discharge home with return not anticipated, and there was no evidence in the clinical record that the ombudsman was notified of the discharge. An email sent about 19 days after discharge contained only a list of residents who were discharged, deceased, or transferred, and for this resident it listed a discharge/transfer to another hospital without the reason for discharge or the same information provided to the family. For Resident #12, admitted with atherosclerotic heart disease, the discharge MDS documented an unplanned discharge to hospice at home. A discharge/transfer/LOA form indicated discharge to the community with hospice services at a private home/apartment, initiated by the resident or representative, and a discharge summary and progress note documented discharge home with belongings, medications, and paperwork. There was no physician order for discharge in the order summary report, and the clinical record did not show that a copy of the discharge notification was sent to the ombudsman. In an interview, the Resident Relations Manager stated that a copy of the notification is not sent to the ombudsman and that ombudsman information is not provided to residents. For Resident #100, admitted with COPD, an order directed transfer to the ED for shortness of breath, and a discharge summary documented respiratory distress and transport via ambulance to an acute care hospital. A social services note stated that the resident or representative was provided written notice of transfer, bed-hold notice, readmission policy, ombudsman and appeals information. However, the clinical record contained no evidence that a copy of the transfer notice was sent to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. For Resident #102, admitted and later readmitted with hepatic encephalopathy, influenza, and cirrhosis, clinical documentation showed an anticipated discharge to the community, an NP note indicating discharge to prior living arrangements, and an unplanned discharge home/community on the MDS. A discharge/transfer/LOA form and discharge summary documented discharge to a private home/apartment without hospice, initiated by the resident or representative, and a social services note recorded that the family picked the resident up and took him back to the reservation. There was no physician discharge order, and no indication in the record that a copy of the discharge notification was sent to the ombudsman. Interviews with the ombudsman and facility staff further described the deficient practice. The ombudsman reported that their office previously received a list of discharged/transferred residents but had not received anything for recent months and that they were sent only a list, not copies of discharge/transfer notifications. The Resident Relations Manager and Business Office Manager stated that Resident Relations is responsible for presenting the notice of proposed discharge/transfer, that the notice is presented up to 72 hours prior to discharge, and that a copy of the notification is not sent to the ombudsman. They also stated they were unsure if any policy or guidance outlined what information must be included in the notice and confirmed that the NOMNC was the only form used as a discharge/transfer notice, even though it lacked ombudsman and advocacy contact information. The acting DON reported being unfamiliar with discharge/transfer notification requirements, and the Executive Director stated that the facility used only the NOMNC, believed no paper notice was required beyond that, and understood the facility’s obligation as sending a monthly list of discharged/transferred residents to the ombudsman, not copies of the actual transfer/discharge notifications.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to Provide Written Discharge Notice: A cognitively intact resident with osteomyelitis, paraplegia, and chronic pain syndrome was discharged AMA, but the discharge notice in the record had no resident signature confirming receipt. The SSD and CNO initialed the form, and the SSD stated the resident did not receive a copy because he left and did not return, while the CEO was unsure whether written notice was provided.
A resident left the facility against medical advice, but the EMR lacked documentation that the LTC Ombudsman was notified in writing of the discharge. In a separate case, another resident was discharged to the community, but the record lacked a discharge summary with a recap of the stay and medication reconciliation; staff stated nursing and social services were responsible for discharge documentation and planning.
Failure to Send Transfer Information and Provide Bed-Hold Notice: The facility did not document that necessary clinical information was sent to the receiving provider when several residents were transferred to the hospital, including residents with CHF, AFib, dementia, CVA history, respiratory failure, sepsis, pneumonitis, depression, HTN, and weakness. The facility also lacked evidence that written bed-hold policy information was given to residents and/or their representatives at transfer, despite policy requiring notice of bed-hold rights, reserve bed payment details, and the per diem rate to hold the bed.
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold notice to two residents at the time of hospital transfer. One resident was admitted for skilled services and had multiple hospital transfers without documentation of a bed-hold notice, and another resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation without receiving the required notice. Staff confirmed the notices were not provided because the facility does not give written bed-hold notice for residents transferred to the hospital.
A resident’s discharge record was incomplete and did not accurately reflect the resident’s condition at transfer to a boarding care facility. The chart included HF, DM2, cerebral infarction, and aphasia, but omitted dementia with psychosis from the DS and other transfer documents sent by the SSD. The DON acknowledged the DS and MDS were not updated for accuracy, while the MAR received by the boarding care facility did include psychosis.
A resident with obesity, a T-11 to T-12 SCI, multiple rib fractures, and a dislocated elbow was discharged to another SNF, but the facility did not provide recent information about a non-injury fall and an abuse-related sexual behavior allegation. Staff acknowledged no verbal report was given before discharge, and the receiving facility reported the resident arrived without authorization, report, or orders.
Failure to Provide Written Discharge Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a written notice of discharge was provided to Resident #37, who was discharged from the facility. The facility’s policy required written notice of transfer or discharge to the resident, the resident’s representative, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and required the notice to include the reason for discharge, the effective date, the destination, and ombudsman contact information. Resident #37 was admitted with diagnoses including other chronic osteomyelitis, paraplegia, and chronic pain syndrome, and an admission MDS documented that he was cognitively intact. The Notice of Discharge or Transfer form in the resident’s record was dated 5/21/26, but there was no resident signature in the verification of receipt section. Instead, the form stated that Resident #37 left the facility against medical advice (AMA) and included the initials of the SSD and CNO. The CEO stated the SSD was responsible for discharges and transfers and that the facility had obtained a current address for Resident #37, but did not know whether he received written notice. The SSD stated that Resident #37 did not receive a copy of the notice because he left the facility and did not return, and there was no address to mail it to him.
Missing Ombudsman Notification and Discharge Summary Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of Resident 53’s discharge from the facility. Resident 53’s records showed admission to the facility and a discharge return not anticipated MDS dated 05/07/2026 documenting discharge to the community on 05/07/2026. A social service progress note on 05/07/2026 at 1:30 PM stated the resident did not want to stay at the facility and left against medical advice, but the EMR lacked documentation that the Ombudsman was notified of the discharge. The facility was unable to provide such documentation when requested, and administrative staff confirmed the facility had not been notifying the Ombudsman of resident discharges prior to the survey. The facility also failed to complete a discharge summary for Resident 6 that included a recapitulation of the resident’s stay and/or reconciliation of medications after discharge. Resident 6’s admission MDS documented admission to the facility, and a progress note dated 06/29/2026 recorded discharge orders received for discharge to the community. However, the EMR lacked a discharge summary addressing the resident’s stay or medication reconciliation. Staff interviews indicated that nursing staff should ensure discharge orders, complete a discharge assessment to recap the resident’s stay, reconcile medications, and document medication disposition, while social services should open the discharge evaluation and set up the discharge plan. Administrative staff confirmed the record lacked the required discharge summary information.
Failure to Send Transfer Information and Provide Bed-Hold Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider when residents were transferred to the hospital. Review of clinical records showed that Resident R2, who had heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and dementia, had hospital transfers documented on 3/24/26 and 6/23/26, but the record lacked evidence that necessary clinical information was sent with the resident. Resident R5, with diagnoses including unspecified cerebrovascular disease, respiratory failure, dementia, and swallowing difficulty, had a hospital transfer documented on 5/10/26, and the record also lacked evidence that necessary clinical information was communicated to the receiving provider. Resident R43, diagnosed with sepsis, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and swallowing difficulty, had a transfer to the hospital on 5/28/26, and the record lacked evidence of communication of necessary clinical information. Resident R55, with depression, hypertension, and muscle weakness, had transfers documented on 5/29/26 and 6/17/26, and the record lacked evidence that necessary clinical information was communicated. Resident R94, with hypertension, dementia, and heart failure, had transfers documented on 11/13/25, 1/4/26, and 4/10/26, and the record lacked evidence that necessary clinical information was communicated to the receiving health care provider. The facility also failed to provide written bed-hold policy information to residents and/or their representatives upon transfer. The facility policy stated that prior to transfer, written information would be given explaining the resident’s rights and limitations regarding bed-hold, the reserve bed payment policy, the per diem rate required to hold the bed, and the details of the transfer. However, the clinical records for Resident R5, Resident R43, Resident R55, and Resident R94 lacked evidence that they and/or their representatives were provided a copy of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer. During interview, the DON confirmed that the clinical information should have been provided to the receiving health care provider and that the bed-hold policy should have been provided to the resident or representative upon transfer.
Failure to Provide Written Bed-Hold Notice at Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written bed-hold notice at the time of hospital transfer for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident #4 was admitted for skilled services and was transferred to the hospital on 3/9/26, 4/28/26, and 6/25/26, but there was no documentation that a written bed-hold notice was provided at the time of any of those transfers. Resident #4 confirmed during interview that they did not receive a written bed-hold notice related to the hospital transfers. Resident #23 was sent to the hospital for evaluation on 6/9/26, and there was no documentation that a written bed-hold notice was provided at the time of transfer. Staff A confirmed that Resident #23 was not provided a written bed-hold notice at the time of the hospital transfer, and later confirmed that Resident #4 and Resident #23 were not provided written bed-hold notices for the hospital transfers because the facility does not provide written bed-hold notice for residents transferred to the hospital.
Incomplete Discharge Documentation for Resident with Dementia and Psychosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident 1’s discharge record was complete and accurately reflected the resident’s clinical condition and care needs at the time of transfer to a boarding care facility. Resident 1’s record showed admission with diagnoses including heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The MDS dated 4/3/2026 indicated moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decisions and need for supervision or touching assistance with several ADLs. Earlier records included an H&P stating the resident had capacity to understand and make decisions, while later physician and psychiatry progress notes documented dementia with psychosis, unspecified psychosis, insomnia, and dementia. The discharge summary dated 5/29/2026 stated the resident’s health had improved sufficiently and listed diagnoses including cerebral infarction, aphasia following cerebral infarction, heart failure, and type 2 diabetes, but it did not include dementia with psychosis. The SSD stated she sent the boarding care facility the face sheet, medication review, and H&P, and that dementia with psychosis was not included in the documents sent. The SSD stated she was not aware of that diagnosis and noted miscommunication between the MDs and facility staff. The DON stated the boarding care facility received the MAR, which included psychosis, and acknowledged the discharge summary and MDS failed to update the diagnosis of dementia for accuracy. The facility policy required documentation of all services provided and changes in medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition in the resident’s medical record.
Failure to Communicate Recent Fall and Abuse Allegation at Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure discharge planning included providing recent information related to an abuse allegation and a recent fall for one resident who was being discharged to another skilled nursing facility. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including obesity, a T-11 to T-12 spinal cord injury, multiple fractured ribs, and dislocation of the right ulnohumeral joint. The admission MDS documented the resident was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, was dependent on staff for bathing and transfers, and was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. A social services note documented that the accepting facility had been contacted and discharge was planned. However, progress notes documented the resident had a non-injury fall in the activity room and later exhibited inappropriate sexual behavior toward female residents, including exposing his genitalia and making unwanted sexual propositions, after which he was placed on 1:1 observation. Staff later acknowledged the accepting facility was not contacted to provide a verbal report before discharge, and the accepting facility reported the resident arrived without authorization, without a report, and without orders. Staff also acknowledged they were unsure whether the accepting facility had been notified of the fall or the sexual abuse allegation prior to discharge.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.