Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Failure to Respond Promptly and Appropriately to Resident Call Lights

Desoto, Texas Survey Completed on 03-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure residents’ rights to dignity, respect, and timely response to call lights. Multiple residents with varying levels of cognitive and physical impairment reported or were associated with delayed call light responses. One resident, an elderly female with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, stroke with left-sided paralysis, and protein-calorie malnutrition, was dependent on staff for repositioning and had no skin conditions on admission; her family member reported that staff took 45 minutes to answer call lights and over two hours to attend to her during rounding. Another resident, an elderly female with intact cognition and diagnoses including malnutrition, difficulty walking, and lack of coordination, stated that it could take staff up to an hour to respond to her call bell, occurring on all shifts depending on which staff were working. Additional residents with intact or moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses such as type 2 diabetes, muscle wasting, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and end-stage renal disease were included in the review for resident rights. Resident council meeting minutes from two consecutive months documented complaints about call light response times, including reports that staff would enter rooms, turn off call lights, and leave without assisting with residents’ needs. The facility grievance logs for January and February recorded concerns related to call light response times. These interviews, resident council minutes, and grievance records collectively showed that residents’ call lights were not answered promptly and that staff sometimes silenced call lights without providing assistance, resulting in residents not being treated with respect and dignity as required.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙