Failure to Care Plan Ongoing Medication Refusals for a Cognitively Impaired Resident
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan addressing a resident’s repeated refusal of medications. The resident was a 70-year-old male admitted with acute kidney failure, pain in the left hand, and traumatic brain compression with herniation. His MDS comprehensive assessment showed a Cognitive Patterns score of 6, indicating severe cognitive issues. The existing care plan included a focus on impaired cognitive function with an intervention to administer medications as ordered and monitor for side effects and effectiveness, and a separate focus on the resident’s preference to receive one pill with a full container of pudding. However, there was no specific care plan focus or interventions addressing his ongoing refusal to take multiple prescribed medications. Record review of the MARs for February and March showed that the resident refused numerous medications on multiple occasions, including fluticasone nasal spray, Lidoderm patches, sodium chloride nasal solution, atorvastatin, melatonin, Seroquel, apixaban, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and sevelamer carbonate. Despite this pattern of refusals, the care plan was not updated to include measurable objectives, timeframes, or individualized interventions to address the refusals. The resident reported that he did not take medications he disliked because they made him feel sick and tasted terrible, and he believed he would get better on his own. He stated that his pain was there for a reason and that medications covered up the pain when there were severe problems. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that medication refusals were not incorporated into the resident’s care plan. LVN A stated that medication refusals should be in the care plan and that she documented refusals in progress notes or the MAR but had not been asked to review care plans and had not done so. The interim part-time DON, who assisted with care plans, stated that medication refusal should be care planned and that everything a resident did had to go in the care plan, but acknowledged difficulties with documentation due to heavy reliance on agency staff. RN A, identified as responsible for care plans, stated that medication refusals should be care planned and that she relied on 24-hour reports and nurses’ input, but she was unsure if this resident refused medications and believed he would take them with pudding. Other nurses and aides reported hearing or observing the resident refuse medications, sometimes even when pudding was offered, and stated that such refusals should be care planned with interventions. The Administrator described the care plan as a blueprint of who the resident was and agreed that medication refusals should be care planned with interventions, but the resident’s care plan still lacked a specific problem and interventions for his repeated medication refusals, despite the facility’s written policy that care plans be used to guide daily care and be updated when changes in condition occur. The facility’s care plan policy, “Using the Care Plan,” stated that completed care plans are to be used in developing residents’ daily care routines, must be available to staff responsible for providing care, and that changes in residents’ conditions must be reported so that assessments and care plans can be reviewed and updated. It also required that documentation be consistent with the resident’s care plan. In this case, although staff documented refusals on the MAR and were aware of the resident’s behavior and preferences regarding medication administration, this information was not translated into a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable goals and interventions specifically addressing the ongoing medication refusals, leading to the cited deficiency. The physician reported he did not remember being informed that the resident was refusing medications and stated that if a resident repeatedly refused medications, he would want to know and that the facility should care plan such refusals. Agency nurses reported limited familiarity with the resident and inconsistent use or review of care plans. Overall, the deficiency arose from the facility’s failure to integrate known, ongoing medication refusals into the resident’s care plan, despite multiple staff recognizing that such refusals should be care planned and despite a facility policy requiring care plans to reflect changes in condition and guide care and documentation.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Failure to Include Bipolar Disorder and Anxiety in Care Plan: A resident with bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, and dementia had psychiatry notes documenting ongoing symptoms and medication management, but the care plan did not include focus areas for bipolar disorder or anxiety. The MDS coordinator confirmed these diagnoses were not included in the care plan.
Missing behavior and side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications: A resident with dementia, psychotic disorder, anxiety, and depression, another resident with traumatic brain injury and schizoaffective disorder, and a third resident receiving multiple psychotropics had no documented behavior monitoring or side effect assessments to support ongoing use of the medications. Staff confirmed missing monitoring orders and records, and the DON could not provide documentation showing routine monitoring of behaviors, symptoms, or AIMS follow-up after dose increases.
Failure to care plan an external catheter urinary wicking system: A resident with anxiety, chronic pain, scoliosis, and end stage HF was admitted cognitively intact but dependent for toileting and personal hygiene and always incontinent. His care plan addressed incontinence care, but it did not include the external catheter system, who would reapply it, or when the collection canister would be emptied. The resident said he needed help with setup and reapplication, urine containers were observed on the floor with one full of dark yellow urine, and the DON stated the system should have been addressed on the care plan.
Incomplete and Outdated Person-Centered Care Plans: A resident’s care plan did not include full code status even though the chart and orders documented full code, and another resident’s care plan was not revised after recent behaviors led to a psych assessment documenting instability and directing redirection. The records showed significant medical and cognitive diagnoses, but the care plans did not fully reflect the residents’ current needs and status.
The facility failed to develop and implement complete care plans for two residents. One resident on dialysis had a care plan for ordered diet and meal intake monitoring, but multiple meal percentages were not documented after dialysis meals. Another resident with a suprapubic catheter was observed with an exposed, uncapped attachment nozzle, and the care plan did not include the resident’s self-care of the catheter. Staff and the DON confirmed the resident ate after dialysis and that the catheter tip should be covered when switched.
Care Plan Lacked Dialysis-Specific Information: A resident with acute kidney failure and renal failure was receiving hemodialysis 3 days per week, but the care plan did not include a dialysis-specific focus, goal, or interventions. RN and DON both confirmed the plan lacked basic details such as the nephrologist, dialysis location, access site care and monitoring, and the dialysis schedule.
Failure to Include Bipolar Disorder and Anxiety in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #11, who was reviewed for unnecessary medications. Review of the resident’s psychiatry note dated 04/29/26 documented diagnoses of bipolar disorder and other anxiety disorder, with the note stating that the resident had chronic episodes of depression and manic-like symptoms causing distress and functional impairment, and that mood stabilizer medication needed to be continued long term. A later psychiatry note dated 07/29/26 documented a past psychiatric history of bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, and dementia, and stated that trazodone and Prozac were managing depression, donepezil was helping dementia, lamotrigine was assisting with bipolar disorder, and clonazepam was assisting with anxiety. Review of Resident #11’s care plan showed that it did not include a focus area for bipolar disorder or anxiety disorder. During interview on 08/12/26 at 1:25 PM, the Corporate MDS Coordinator stated that anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder were not included in the resident’s care plan and would be added. The facility’s policy on care plans stated that the comprehensive, person-centered care plan will describe the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident’s highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Missing behavior and side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for behaviors and side effects was documented for 3 of 6 residents reviewed. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, seizure disorder, psychotic disorder, anxiety disorder, and depression, and had physician orders for multiple psychotropic medications, including olanzapine, haloperidol, and Ativan. No orders were found directing staff to monitor the resident for behaviors or side effects related to these medications. During review, staff confirmed that no such monitoring orders were present in the MAR or TAR, and the DON stated that behavioral and side effect monitoring orders had not been restarted after the resident returned from the hospital. Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder-bipolar type, major depressive disorder, and paraplegia, and had orders for Haldol, olanzapine, and divalproex sodium. The record did not contain an order for behavior monitoring or assessment of antipsychotic side effects, and there was no behavior monitoring flow record in the EMR. Although an AIMS assessment had been completed on 3/29/26 showing no abnormal movements, Haldol and divalproex doses were increased in May 2026 without a follow-up AIMS assessment for the dose changes or the scheduled quarterly assessment in June 2026. Resident #4 had orders for paroxetine, trazodone, divalproex, and risperidone, but the clinical record, including nursing documentation and behavior monitoring records, contained no documented behaviors, symptoms, frequency, severity, or other clinical indicators showing the continued need for the psychotropic medications. The DON was unable to provide documentation showing the resident's behaviors or symptoms were routinely monitored to evaluate effectiveness and continued clinical need, despite facility policy requiring behavior and side effect monitoring every shift using the electronic Behavior Monitoring Flow Record.
Failure to Care Plan External Catheter Urinary Wicking System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who was admitted with anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, scoliosis, and end stage heart failure. The resident’s admission MDS, dated 06/08/2026, indicated a BIMS score of 13, that he was cognitively intact with little to no impairment, dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and always incontinent. The comprehensive care plan printed 08/10/2026 addressed bladder incontinence with interventions for incontinent care every 2 hours and moisture barrier application after each episode, but it did not include the resident’s external catheter urinary wicking system. The record did not identify who was responsible for reapplying the external catheter system, emptying the collection canister, or the frequency for those tasks. During interview and observation on 8/10/26, the resident stated he used the external catheter urinary wicking system, paid for the supplies himself, and needed assistance with setup and reapplication as needed. Two urine collection containers were observed on the floor next to the bed, and one was full of dark yellow urine. On 08/11/2026, the DON stated the hospice nurse applied the system weekly on Mondays, there were no orders or documentation for it being changed, and the system should have been addressed on the care plan to ensure care and services were provided on admission. During a later observation, the resident said the bag had been off since yesterday, then said it had just come off, and the DON and Regional Nurse applied the external catheter urinary wicking system after completing care.
Incomplete and Outdated Person-Centered Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents, including measurable objectives and timeframes to meet identified medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. For one resident, the record showed admission with diagnoses including complete traumatic amputation of the right foot, diabetes II, and cognitive communications deficit, and the admission record and physician orders documented full code status. The resident’s MDS reflected a BIMS score of 13/15 and wheelchair use, but the care plan did not include the resident’s full code status. For another resident, the record showed diagnoses including pelvic fracture, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder, with a quarterly MDS documenting a BIMS score of 00 and no behavioral symptoms. The care plan included a potential for physical aggression related to dementia/confusion and a note about antidepressant use related to depression, but nursing staff did not review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan after recent behaviors prompted a psychiatric assessment that documented the resident as unstable and directed use of redirection. The DON stated care plans should be updated with changes as they happen, new orders, and quarterly updates.
Incomplete care planning and documentation for dialysis nutrition and catheter self-care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #6 related to dialysis and meal intake documentation. Resident #6’s care plan, initiated on 5/21/2026, included interventions to provide and serve diet as ordered and to monitor intake and record it every meal. However, the Task ADL Eating and Meal Percentage record did not document meal intake percentages for 7/16/2026, 7/17/2026, 7/18/2026, 7/23/2026, 7/25/2026, 7/30/2026, 8/1/2026, 8/3/2026, 8/4/2026, and 8/6/2026. The physician order dated 5/20/2026 specified a renal diet, regular texture, regular/thin liquids, and a 1000 ml fluid restriction. Staff stated that after dialysis the resident returned to the facility for lunch and that meal intake should be recorded in PointClickCare, and the DON stated the resident normally received a chef salad or new tray after dialysis and that staff should record what was given and what was eaten. The facility also failed to include Resident #18’s self-care of a suprapubic catheter in the care plan initiated on 06/07/2026. During observation on 08/09/2026, the resident’s Foley bag was hanging from the bedside frame and the attachment nozzle was exposed and lying on the bed. Staff stated the resident switches to the leg bag himself and that the tip should be covered. The resident stated he wears the larger bag at night and puts the leg bag on in the morning himself, and the ADON/Infection Control Nurse stated that when a new leg bag is opened it comes with a blue cap and it needs to be covered when he switches it and leaves it on the bed. The MDS for 06/07/2026 documented an indwelling catheter Foley, and the physician order read suprapubic catheter care every shift.
Care Plan Lacked Dialysis-Specific Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and maintained for a resident with kidney failure who was receiving hemodialysis. R1's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated she was cognitively intact, required minimal to moderate assistance with activities of daily living, and had diagnoses of acute kidney failure and renal failure. R1's EMAR showed an order for dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, but her care plan did not include a focus, goal, or intervention specific to dialysis. During interview, RN-A confirmed R1 received dialysis 3 days per week and stated the care plan did not contain information about R1's nephrologist, where she received dialysis treatments, or how to monitor or care for the dialysis site. RN-A stated she would expect basic information related to dialysis. The DON also confirmed the care plan lacked a focus, goal, and intervention for R1's dialysis treatment and stated she expected care plans for residents receiving dialysis to include information such as access site care and monitoring, nutritional guidelines or restrictions, and the dialysis schedule.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.