Elopement of Cognitively Impaired Resident Due to Inadequate Supervision and Security Screening
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate supervision and prevent accidents when a cognitively impaired resident was able to leave the building unnoticed during the night and was later found on a public street. The resident was an older female admitted for rehabilitation after a cerebral infarction (stroke) and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Her care plan identified an ADL self-care performance deficit related to weakness and deconditioning from a recent hospital stay, with interventions focused on encouraging participation in care, use of the call bell, explanation of procedures, and PT/OT evaluation and treatment. The care plan did not identify or address elopement risk or specific supervision needs related to her cognitive status. On the night of the incident, nursing documentation shows that at approximately 11:00 p.m. the resident was observed in bed sleeping and vital signs were taken without changes. Around 1:00–1:15 a.m., the RN making rounds discovered the resident was no longer in her bed, checked her bathroom and adjacent rooms, and did not find her. Security was alerted, and the RN searched the stairwell and pool area without locating the resident, then proceeded to the front of the building. A security guard reported that he had allowed a woman to exit the building around that time, believing she was homeless. Staff then searched outside and found the resident walking on a pedestrian walkway along the road to the right side of the building. She was returned to the facility, assessed with no injuries noted, and one-on-one supervision was initiated. Interviews and record reviews revealed multiple failures in supervision and identification that led to the elopement. The security guard stated he saw the resident in the swimming pool area, opened a locked gate for her when she could not open it, and escorted her out the front door without asking her name or any identifying questions, without checking for identification, and without notifying nursing staff. He reported assuming she was homeless based on her statement that she came through a back door used by homeless individuals and stated he did not see any identifying bracelets or clothing that would make him think she was a resident, although the family member reported the resident was wearing a fall-risk bracelet and a visible heart monitor. The facility had a pool area and dog park accessible from emergency exits and gates, and the resident was able to reach these areas and then the front of the building without being recognized or stopped by staff. The family member and speech therapist both described the resident as having significant cognitive and communication deficits, including difficulty understanding verbal instructions, needing repeated explanations and visual aids, and not consistently being oriented to person, place, or time, yet these deficits were not effectively incorporated into supervision practices that would have prevented her from leaving the facility unnoticed.
Removal Plan
- Instituted immediate monitoring of emergency exit doors leading outside to the pool and common areas by assigning a staff person at each door of egress; implemented a sign-in/sign-out sheet and prohibited resident/visitor/staff exit unless there is an emergency; ensured assigned staff are relieved for breaks/lunches with documentation on an assigned form.
- Implemented staff exterior walking rounds with documentation, including hourly rounds in the dog park and pool areas; verified dog park gate and pool gate are secured with staff initials.
- Implemented walkie-talkie protocol: charge nurses check out walkie talkies at the beginning of each shift and return them at the end to enhance communication with security.
- Re-educated staff on emergency exit and fire door usage: staff must not use these doors unless there is an emergency and must investigate each time an alarm sounds.
- Re-educated staff on elopement/missing resident procedures: alert staff by calling a Code Yellow, complete skills check quiz for each employee, and ensure elopement binders are located on the 1st and 2nd floor nurses' stations and at the front desk.
- Provided in-service on abuse and neglect (definitions, types, reporting) and identified the abuse coordinator.
- Provided instant in-service on unfamiliar person protocol to remind staff of obligations to identify all persons on the property.
- Completed elopement risk assessments on all residents in the facility.
- Conducted impromptu QAPI meetings addressing resident elopement, binder use, behavior monitoring, swimming pool concerns, and staff assignment at fire door/egress monitoring.
- Began facility-wide education on emergency exit usage and alarm investigation for all departments; ensured staff not in-serviced would be in-serviced prior to their next shift with documentation.
- Completed facility-wide education on resident elopement/missing resident search procedure, proper notification, resident assessments, and resident monitoring; ensured staff not reeducated would be reeducated before their next shift; began elopement skills testing with documentation.
- Began facility-wide education on abuse and neglect (definitions, abuse coordinator, types, importance of timely notification); ensured staff not reeducated would be reeducated before their next shift; implemented abuse/neglect skills testing once per shift.
- Re-educated security/concierge staff on initial contact and verification of a wandering resident: ask identifying questions, check for identifying markers, call nurses’ stations to verify, and refer to the elopement binder; required retraining prior to returning to duty with documentation.
- Implemented additional communication protocol between nursing and front desk/security using walkie talkies: devices located/charged at concierge desk; at least one security associate and one direct care associate on each floor carry walkie talkies; one issued per floor with sign-out and return at end of shift; education completed prior to next shift with documentation.
- Educated night shift staff on security protocol, unfamiliar persons protocol, and abuse and neglect.
- Provided immediate re-education to all security and concierge staff on safety monitoring protocols: hourly walking rounds in pool and dog park areas, continuous monitoring of pool area via security cameras with feed visible at all times, prompt reporting of adverse findings to leadership, and accurate/timely documentation; documented on an in-service sheet.
- Re-educated the Healthcare Administrator on the facility abuse policy and elopement policy.
- Regional Director of Clinical Services educated the Executive Director and Healthcare Administrator on missing resident policy and swimming pool/spa policy.
- Provided ongoing oversight by the Executive Director and Healthcare Administrator to ensure adherence to protocols, with prompt corrective action and additional training for deviations.
- Placed a staff member at the emergency exit door between the dog park and pool area to redirect anyone attempting to exit unless there is an active emergency; maintained coverage until the gate could be reassessed and an appropriate locking mechanism installed.
- Scheduled a meeting with an approved technology company with the Administrator, Director of Maintenance, and Executive Director to assess and implement an appropriate locking mechanism for the gate between the dog park and pool area.
- Required security to complete hourly walking rounds of the pool and dog park areas; document and report any adverse findings to the Director of Resident Services, Executive Director, and Healthcare Administrator.
- Reviewed the pool area policy and reaffirmed that access is restricted to Independent Living residents and skilled care residents are not allowed access.
- Conducted monitoring observations and interviews across all shifts to verify in-service training completion and staff competencies/understanding, including reenactment drills and knowledge checks.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Unsafe Cord Placement and Failure to Follow Fall Interventions: A resident with cognitive impairment and wheelchair use had a TV power cord stretched tightly across the closet doorway, blocking access and creating an environmental hazard when staff had to lift the cord to open the closet. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and a fall-risk care plan repeatedly ran barefoot in the hallway while staff observed but did not consistently provide planned interventions such as gripper socks, footwear, ambulation assistance, or redirection.
A resident with impaired cognition, cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, extensive ADL needs, and a fall history was identified as a high fall risk with care plan interventions including removing a movable bedside table. After a fall, the resident was found using the table as a walker, yet observations showed the table still placed beside the bed on multiple occasions, including when staff were present. Staff interviews confirmed they were unaware of the current fall prevention interventions and that the table remained at bedside for meals despite the care plan.
Failure to complete a restraint assessment before using a wheelchair alarm for a resident with muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan included the alarm as an intervention, but the record lacked an initial Restraint Evaluation, and the CNO confirmed the assessment had not been completed before the alarm was placed.
A resident with cognitive deficits, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, fracture, and repeated falls was dependent for toileting and care planned for an EZ stand with 2-person assist. During observed transfers, staff placed the harness and straps correctly, but the resident only rose to about 135 degrees and never came to a full stand, while staff remained by the bathroom door during privacy periods and continued the transfer despite the resident not standing fully. An RN stated the resident was expected to stand straight up with the EZ stand and that staff should sit the resident back down and try again if not.
A resident with Alzheimer's disease and dementia was found wandering in the parking lot after leaving the building unsupervised. A family member visiting another resident saw her looking into car windows and alerted staff, who were not aware she had exited until the report. Staff interviews showed the resident had been seen earlier eating in the dining room, but no one was actively looking for her or knew she had left the facility.
A resident with parkinsonism and Alzheimer's disease, severe cognitive impairment, and a fall history was pushed in her wheelchair without foot pedals and was not assisted when she called out for help. Nursing notes and staff interviews showed a CNA propelled the resident multiple times without foot pedals, including one instance where her socked foot hit the floor, and staff acknowledged that foot pedals should be used when pushing a resident.
Unsafe Cord Placement and Failure to Follow Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a television power cord was properly secured and maintained so it did not create an environmental accident hazard for R46. R46’s quarterly MDS identified moderate cognitive impairment, maximum assistance needed for dressing, grooming, and toileting hygiene, moderate assistance with transfers, and wheelchair use. During observation, R46 was in his room with the television mounted on the wall between the bathroom and closet, and the power cord ran across the closet doors and across the upper drawer of the dresser to a surge protector on top of the dresser. When R46 tried to open the closet doors, the cord was stretched tightly across the doorway and prevented the doors from opening fully unless the cord was lifted away. A later observation showed NA-D had to lift the cord above the closet door to open it and retrieve clothing. NA-D stated the cord had been positioned that way for about one year and could be dangerous if R46 pulled on it, and maintenance staff stated they were only notified that day that the television needed to be fixed. The facility also failed to ensure fall interventions were followed for R13, who had severe cognitive impairment with disorganized thinking and inattention, verbal behaviors toward others, and dependence on staff for footwear and partial to moderate assistance with dressing. R13’s care plan identified her as at risk for falls and included interventions such as ambulating with the resident, encouraging gripper socks, obtaining slip-on shoes, reducing noise, offering snacks, assisting her back to her room when running in the hallway, offering a wheelchair, and redirecting her to slow down. During observations, R13 repeatedly exited her room barefoot and ran through the hallway, including multiple times over an extended period, while staff observed but did not provide gripper socks or shoes, walk with her, redirect her to slow down, or offer other care-planned interventions. Staff interviews indicated they had difficulty redirecting her because she became agitated, and the DON stated the care plan should be followed to ensure safety.
Failure to Follow Fall Prevention Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent further falls for one resident who was reviewed for falls. The resident had moderate impaired cognition, diagnoses including cancer and non-Alzheimer's dementia, required extensive assistance with ADLs including toileting, transfers, and locomotion, and had a history of falls. The resident's care plan identified the resident as a high fall risk related to de-conditioning, cognitive deficits, and prior falls, and included interventions such as anti-rollbacks on the wheelchair, appropriate footwear, keeping a wheelchair behind the resident when ambulating, and removing the mobile bedside table from beside the bed. After a fall in which the resident was found on the floor by the room doorway with the mobile bedside table in the hallway next to him, the resident stated he had been using the table as a walker. Despite the care plan and post-fall assessment identifying removal of the mobile bedside table as an intervention, observations showed the movable bedside table still placed alongside the bed on multiple occasions, including when staff were present in the room. Staff interviews confirmed they were unaware of the current fall prevention interventions, acknowledged the table was movable, and stated it remained at the bedside to facilitate meals. The DON confirmed the table had been at the bedside and was removed only after the surveyor discussed it with staff.
Failure to complete restraint assessment before wheelchair alarm use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a restraint assessment before implementing a wheelchair alarm for Resident #18. Resident #18 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan for impaired mobility and fall risk, dated 3/8/26, included a wheelchair alarm as an intervention. A Bed Safety and Transfer Device Evaluation dated 4/28/26 documented that the bed/chair alarm did not restrict mobility, but the record did not include an initial Restraint Evaluation dated on or around 3/8/26 to identify the comprehensive evaluation of the chair alarm. On 7/9/26, the CNO stated that a Restraint Evaluation had not been completed prior to the chair alarm being placed for Resident #18.
Inadequate Supervision During EZ Stand Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance for one resident during transfers with an EZ stand lift. The resident had cognitive deficits and was dependent for toileting, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, fracture, and repeated falls. The care plan identified a moderate fall risk related to weakness and directed toileting with an EZ stand and 2-person assist. During observation, nursing assistants placed the harness, safety belt, straps, and loops appropriately and assisted the resident with the lift, but the resident stood only to approximately 135 degrees and never came to a full stand. On two observed transfers, staff remained by the bathroom door while the resident was given privacy, then re-entered to continue the transfer and complete care. In both observations, the resident never achieved a full standing position despite encouragement and repeated attempts. One nursing assistant stated the transfer was safe because two staff were assisting, while the RN case manager stated she expected the resident to stand straight up when transferred with the EZ stand and that staff should sit the resident back down and try again if the resident did not. The RN case manager was unaware of any concerns about the resident transferring safely with the EZ stand. Facility policy was requested but not provided.
Resident Left Unsupervised and Was Found Wandering in Parking Lot
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize that a cognitively impaired resident had left the building unsupervised and was wandering in the parking lot. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety disorder, and records showed she had moderately impaired cognition, walked and transferred independently, and had no documented wandering behaviors during the MDS lookback period. Although an elopement evaluation had previously concluded she was not at risk for elopement, the care plan identified confusion, impaired cognition, and lack of awareness of safety needs. On the day of the event, a family member visiting another resident saw the resident outside in the parking lot looking into car windows and walking from car to car with a jacket and pocketbook on her arm. The family member stated the resident appeared to be looking for someone and was in the middle area of the parking lot before she reported it to staff. Nurse #3 was notified and went to check on the resident, who was then brought back inside the facility. Staff interviews showed they were not actively looking for the resident and did not know she had exited the facility unsupervised until the family member reported seeing her outside. Staff accounts indicated the resident had been seen earlier in the dining room eating, but no one was aware she had left the building. Nurse #2 and NA #1 both stated they were not aware the resident was missing until the report from the family member. The administrator stated the resident exited through the front entrance doors, but it was not known whether she pushed the button behind the receptionist desk or was let out by a visitor. The previous NP stated the resident needed someone with her if she was outside the facility and could have wandered away if left alone.
Failure to Respond to Help Requests and Use Foot Pedals During Wheelchair Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for R25 when staff did not respond to her requests for help and did not provide foot pedals while propelling her wheelchair. R25 had diagnoses of parkinsonism and Alzheimer's disease, and her records documented severely impaired cognition, including a BIMS score of four on a quarterly MDS. Her care plan stated she was independent with locomotion in her manual wheelchair, but other documentation reflected a history of falls and need for staff assistance with wheelchair mobility. The care plan also lacked documentation regarding foot pedals. Nursing notes and staff interviews showed multiple instances in which R25 was pushed in her wheelchair without foot pedals. On one occasion, a CNA propelled her out of the restroom and her socked foot hit the floor when the wheelchair was pushed. On another occasion, R25 was seated in her wheelchair, holding onto the back of a recliner and calling out for help, while the CNA walked by her. The CNA later propelled R25 down the hallway without foot pedals and at one point pushed the chair and let it go. Staff interviews confirmed that residents should have foot pedals when staff are pushing them, and the CNA stated she should not push R25 without foot pedals.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.