Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Delayed Response to Call Lights for Resident Care Needs

Lancaster, California Survey Completed on 03-20-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure residents’ call lights were answered in a timely manner, resulting in delays in assistance for two residents. Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including sequelae of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, diabetes mellitus, and generalized weakness, and was documented as alert and oriented with intact cognitive skills but requiring maximum assistance for all ADLs and being frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. According to the resident’s family member, on one occasion when Resident 1 experienced an episode of vomiting, the resident pressed the call light multiple times to request assistance, but no staff responded for 30 to 60 minutes. Resident 3 was admitted with a right femur neck fracture, generalized muscle weakness, and dysphagia, and had the capacity to understand and make decisions, with the MDS later indicating moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decisions, maximum assistance needs for toileting and showering, and frequent bowel and bladder incontinence. Resident 3 reported that on the evening shift, staff sometimes took a long time to respond to the call light for incontinent care, and if no one answered, the resident would call a family member to request help. The family member confirmed that the resident often called in the evening when call lights were not answered for incontinence care, prompting the family member to call the facility to ask staff to change the resident’s incontinent brief. The DON acknowledged that delays in responding to call lights can delay meeting residents’ needs and can possibly cause skin breakdown such as pressure ulcers. The facility’s policy on the resident call system stated that the facility is adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system relaying calls directly to staff or a centralized work area from residents’ bedside, floor, or toileting facilities.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙