Incomplete informed consent for psychotropic medications
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives were fully informed in advance of proposed psychotropic medication treatment for five residents reviewed. The report states that the facility’s psychotropic medication policy required staff and the physician to review non-pharmacological alternatives, the indication and rationale, potential risks and benefits, and the resident’s or representative’s right to accept or decline treatment before obtaining documented consent or refusal. For Resident 28, who was documented as having capacity to understand and make decisions, sertraline was ordered for depression manifested by verbalizing sadness, but the informed consent was obtained five days after the medication had already started. The same resident later had Ativan changed from as-needed use to a routine once-daily order for anxiety and restlessness, but the record did not show documentation that informed consent was obtained when the frequency changed. For Resident 47, who also had capacity to understand and make decisions, hydroxyzine had an informed consent form for a 30-day order for agitation/anxiety manifested by inability to relax, but the record did not show consent when the order was changed from a 30-day duration to a routine order with no stop date. The record also did not show that informed consent was obtained before prazosin was administered for nightmares. The DON acknowledged that prazosin was used off-label as a psychotropic medication and that consent should have been obtained before administration and when frequency or duration changed. For Resident 9, who had no capacity to understand and make medical decisions, Zoloft was ordered for anxiety manifested by defecating on the floor, and consent was obtained from the responsible party, but the psychotropic medication disclosure did not include the list of possible non-pharmacological approaches related to the behavior. For Resident 25, who also had no capacity, Risperdal was ordered for psychosis manifested by aggressive behavior and striking out, but the disclosure did not include possible non-pharmacological approaches. For Resident 38, who had an order for escitalopram for anxiety manifested by being unable to keep still, the disclosure did not include the indication and manifested behaviors. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON confirmed these omissions in the consent documentation.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.