Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Provide Timely Discharge Notices and Appeal Information

Oakland, California Survey Completed on 03-18-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide required discharge notices in a timely manner, including appeal rights and bed-hold information, for two residents. For one resident admitted with peripheral vertigo, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive symptoms, the Admission Record showed admission in November and an MDS dated late January documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge, also dated and signed in late January, included appeal rights and contact information, and stated that if the resident believed the proposed discharge was inappropriate, the resident had the right to appeal to the state long-term care agency. Progress notes and the Discharge Summary and Post-Care Instructions for that same date showed the resident was discharged that day, indicating the proposed discharge notice was given on the actual day of discharge rather than in advance. For a second resident admitted with necrosis of the right femur, depression, toe cellulitis, and mild cognitive impairment, the Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge was dated mid-February and indicated it was provided to the resident and signed by facility staff the following day. A Social Service Note dated mid-February documented that this resident was discharged that same following day, again showing that the proposed discharge notice was provided on the day of discharge. In an interview, the Social Services Director stated that residents receive several documents at discharge, including a Discharge Summary and Post-Care Instructions, Inventory of Personal Items, a medications list, and a Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge, and acknowledged that the notice provides the proposed discharge date but is only given on the actual day of discharge. The Social Services Director further stated that the 30-day discharge notice requirement is a recent development and that the facility does not yet have an established policy and procedure for it.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙