Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0804
F

Failure to Provide Palatable, Attractive, and Properly Served Meals

Bremerton, Washington Survey Completed on 03-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors observed that the facility failed to provide attractive, palatable, and flavorful food at safe and appetizing temperatures. A sample tray from the kitchen contained creamed corn and green beans running together on the plate, with the corn showing burnt bits and the green beans containing tough strings that had to be removed. The baked chicken breast was unseasoned and bland, the pudding was light gray, thin, and dripping off the spoon with only a faint chocolate taste, and there was no butter provided for the roll. The facility’s Registered Nutritionist/Kitchen Manager stated they were unaware of food complaints and relied on food council meetings and floor staff to communicate resident concerns. One resident with tracheal cancer, a voice box removal, moderate cognitive impairment, and a pureed diet had an untouched lunch tray consisting of a large pile of unidentifiable pureed food and reported the food looked unappealing, had no flavor, and they had no desire to eat it. Another cognitively intact resident did not receive their lunch tray when the cart was first passed; the tray remained on the cart in the hall until a CNA was prompted to deliver it, and the resident then reported the food was cold and terrible, describing prior breakfasts as a glob of eggs and an unpalatable muffin, and receiving two bowls of dry cereal without milk. A third cognitively intact resident reported that the food was terrible, that quality, consistency, and flavor had declined after a period of improvement, and that the facility used too many liquid eggs, including at dinner. The Administrator stated they believed food quality was improving and that managers would increase tasting and post-meal rounds to assess satisfaction.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙