Failure to Assess and Manage Abnormal Catheter Urine Leading to Septic Shock
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate assessment, intervention, and catheter management in response to persistent abnormal urine characteristics and signs of possible infection. The resident was an elderly female with Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, neurogenic bladder, anemia, functional quadriplegia, an indwelling catheter, colostomy, and feeding tube, and was dependent on staff for all ADLs. Her care plan identified her as having a catheter, being at risk for UTIs, and having frequent UTIs, with specific interventions to monitor urine for color, sediment, odor, amount, and to report abnormalities such as blood-tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color, and other signs of UTI to the physician. Physician orders directed that the Foley catheter and drainage bag be changed PRN for signs of infection, obstruction, or compromise of the closed system. On one date, an LVN documented that the resident’s catheter was draining blood-tinged urine, that her blood pressure was low, and that the physician was notified, resulting in orders for a UA and IV fluids. The resident later refused IV fluids, and a UA collected showed blood, protein, mucus, and WBC clumps, with blood and protein flagged as critical, but there were no documented follow-up orders or interventions after these results. The NP documented dark orange/red urine and noted a contaminated UA with mixed microbial growth, ordering a repeat UA and labs, and recorded that the resident had refused IV fluids. The NP stated that dark orange urine could be normal if related to minor bleeding from catheter movement but that dark brown/black urine would not be normal and should be reported; she also stated that whenever a UA was ordered, staff were supposed to change the catheter. The electronic record showed the resident’s indwelling catheter was last changed several months earlier, with no documentation of catheter changes, urine color/characteristics, or change in condition from that date through the days immediately preceding the resident’s transfer to the hospital. Multiple staff interviews and video evidence showed that the resident’s urine had been dark brown to black and foul-smelling for weeks without appropriate assessment, documentation, or escalation. CNAs and LVNs reported that the urine appeared reddish, like iced tea, brown/blackish, and had a bad odor for approximately a month or a few weeks, and that they assumed it was normal after it remained that way; several nurses acknowledged they did not assess the catheter or urine every shift and did not consistently document or notify the physician about the worsening color. Video footage provided by the responsible party showed dark/black, opaque urine in the drainage bag on multiple nights, and hospital staff described the catheter on admission as draining purulent, very dark/black urine with foul odor, pus in the tubing, and mold on the catheter balloon and tip, suggesting it had not been changed for a long time. The facility’s own catheter policy required timely and appropriate assessments, ongoing monitoring for catheter-associated UTI, recognition and reporting of complications, and catheter and drainage bag changes based on clinical indications such as infection or obstruction. Despite these requirements and the resident’s known history of frequent UTIs and chronic catheter use, the facility did not assess, intervene, or change the catheter while the resident’s urine remained abnormal over an extended period, culminating in her transfer to the hospital where she was diagnosed with severe sepsis with septic shock likely from a UTI.
Removal Plan
- Performed a 100% audit (DON, ADON, Wound Care Nurse) of residents with catheters to verify catheter placement/securement, urine characteristics, signs/symptoms of UTI, EMR documentation accuracy, and catheter change dates.
- Replaced any urinary catheter immediately (by a licensed nurse) for residents with abnormal findings; notified physician immediately, implemented new orders promptly, and increased monitoring every shift.
- Provided a 1:1 in-service to the LVN who failed to document catheter change on the importance of documenting all care provided (including catheter changes), with progressive discipline up to termination for further infractions.
- Completed an in-service for all licensed nurses and CNAs on catheter care/maintenance, UTI prevention, change-in-condition notification, documentation requirements, and when to notify the physician; staff were not permitted to return to resident care until in-services were completed.
- Implemented DON/designee review of resident changes in condition via SBAR, documentation, and initiated interventions during clinical meetings; addressed issues immediately with the licensed nurse and/or IDT, resident/RP, and physician as necessary; adopted as standard IDT review process for residents with catheters.
- Implemented DON/designee verification of catheter orders and documentation of catheter care and assessments; adopted as standard IDT review process for residents with catheters.
- Conducted visual checks by DON/designee to ensure catheter care is maintained and without abnormalities until 100% compliance is achieved; communicated potential issues to the IDT, resident/RP, and physician.
- Implemented a questionnaire process to validate effectiveness of the urinary catheter care process with licensed nurses, CNAs, and nurse managers; provided immediate re-education if staff could not answer appropriately.
- Ran a physician orders report to check and verify accuracy of any new catheter orders; immediately corrected issues; adopted as standard IDT review process for residents with catheters.
- Clarified and corrected incomplete/incorrect/conflicting catheter orders/documentation immediately when identified by DON/designee; adopted as standard IDT review process for residents with catheters.
- Conducted an impromptu QAPI meeting with the Medical Director to obtain approval of the action plan.
- Reported findings to the QI process and QA committee monthly (Administrator and DON/designee) and addressed any concerns/recommendations immediately.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.