Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Failure to Document Nursing Response to Critical Lab Result

San Antonio, Texas Survey Completed on 03-27-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for one resident with a critical laboratory result. A progress note for this resident documented a critical CO2 value of 42 (reference range 21–31) and stated that the NP and DON were informed and that the resident was stable at that time. A subsequent note recorded that the night nurse (LVN A) reported sending the results to the NP and was awaiting a response. However, there was no further documentation by LVN A describing his assessment of the resident, any follow-up actions taken, or additional communication with the NP beyond this brief entry. Record review showed there was no change of condition assessment completed in response to the critical CO2 lab value. LVN B reported in interview that she called the NP around breakfast time regarding the critical lab and that the NP did not provide new orders, but she acknowledged she did not enter a progress note and stated she must have forgotten to document the contact and outcome. LVN A, in a telephone interview, did not remember details about receiving the critical lab or whether he wrote any notes. The DON stated that LVN A told him he had assessed the resident, found her stable, and texted the NP and the DON, but acknowledged he did not document these actions. These omissions were inconsistent with the facility’s Change of Condition Notification policy, which requires licensed nurses to document the date, time, and details of the incident and assessment, the time and method of physician contact, the response and any orders, family notification, care plan updates, and inclusion of the incident in the 24-hour report.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙