Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0628
D

Failure to Coordinate Home Health Orders and Communicate PCP Limitations at Discharge

Providence, Rhode Island Survey Completed on 03-09-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure appropriate communication of critical discharge information and coordination with a home care agency for a resident discharged with orders for skilled nursing and therapy. The resident, who had dementia, heart failure, and a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment, was admitted in January 2026 and discharged home on 2/15/2026 with medically necessary home health services ordered by the facility’s Medical Director. The facility’s social worker knew shortly after admission that the resident did not have a community PCP and arranged for a new PCP with an appointment scheduled for 2/26/2026. She also knew that this new PCP would not sign home health orders until the resident was seen in the office, but there was no documentation that this limitation was communicated to the home care agency. The home care agency accepted the referral for services to begin at discharge and conducted an initial assessment on 2/17/2026. Agency records showed that when staff contacted the new PCP for signed orders, they were informed the PCP would not sign until the resident’s 2/26/2026 office visit. The agency then called the facility on multiple occasions, beginning on 2/18/2026, leaving voicemails for the facility social worker to request that the facility’s Medical Director sign the home care orders so services could start before the PCP visit. Progress notes from the agency documented additional voicemails on 2/26/2026 and 2/27/2026, but the facility did not return these calls until 3/5/2026. As a result, the resident did not receive the ordered skilled nursing and therapy services after the initial home care assessment on 2/17/2026. The resident’s family member reported informing the facility a few days after admission that the resident had no PCP and later attempted to contact the social worker on three separate dates after discharge using the correct telephone number, without receiving a return call until 3/5/2026. The family member stated that the social worker had previously assured them that the new PCP had agreed to sign home care orders prior to the office visit, but the social worker could not provide evidence of such an agreement and denied receiving the calls, despite acknowledging the phone number used was correct. The Medical Director stated he had been told by facility staff that the new PCP would sign the orders at discharge and was unaware of the home care agency’s requests for his signature until early March; he indicated he would have signed the orders if he had known the PCP would not sign and that the resident was not receiving services. The record review confirmed there was no evidence the facility communicated to the home care agency that the PCP was new and would not sign orders before seeing the resident, and no timely response to the agency’s and family’s calls, leading to the interruption of ordered home health services following discharge.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙