Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
E

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Medications and Pressure Ulcers

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 03-12-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected residents’ clinical status for three residents. For one resident with dementia and depression who was receiving an antipsychotic (Rexulti) daily, a psychiatry consult documented that a gradual dose reduction (GDR) should not be attempted because the benefits outweighed the risks. However, the resident’s Quarterly MDS for the specified assessment reference date did not indicate in Section N, question N0450, that the physician had documented a GDR as clinically contraindicated. For another resident with bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia who was receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant, and diuretic medications, the Annual MDS for the specified assessment reference date documented only antibiotic and insulin use in Section N, despite the Medication Administration Record showing administration of the other medications during the reference period. In addition, this same resident had a psychiatry consult stating that no GDR of the antipsychotic should be attempted because benefits outweighed risks, but the Quarterly MDS did not indicate that the physician had documented a GDR as clinically contraindicated in Section N0450. Another resident with hypertension and obesity was readmitted after a hospital stay and was noted in the clinical record to have Stage 2, Stage 3, and Stage 4 pressure ulcers present upon admission. The resident’s Quarterly MDS with one assessment reference date documented in Section M that the Stage 2 and Stage 3 pressure ulcers were present upon admission, but coded the Stage 4 pressure ulcer as not present upon admission. A subsequent Quarterly MDS with a later assessment reference date documented only that a Stage 4 pressure ulcer was not present upon admission. During interviews, the Regional Director of Clinical Services and the DON confirmed that these MDS assessments for all three residents were not coded accurately and that the MDS should be an accurate reflection of each resident’s status.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙