Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0760
D

Failure to Administer and Properly Prepare Ordered Insulin Doses

Newark, Ohio Survey Completed on 03-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves failures in insulin administration for two residents with type 2 DM. For Resident #50, who had multiple comorbidities including type 2 DM with hyperglycemia and no cognitive impairment, the care plan directed staff to administer medications and insulin as ordered. The physician’s order specified Lantus 18 units SQ in the morning. During a morning medication pass, an LPN administered the resident’s eye drops and oral medications but did not give the ordered Lantus dose. In a subsequent interview, the LPN confirmed that the resident did not refuse the injection, there were no parameters to hold the Lantus, she did not contact the provider, and the resident’s blood sugar that morning was 97. The facility’s medication administration policy required staff to contact the prescriber if a dosage was believed to be inappropriate or excessive or if there were concerns about adverse consequences, but the LPN did not do so. For Resident #545, who had type 2 DM and other diagnoses including dementia and chronic kidney disease, the care plan identified a risk for hyper/hypoglycemia and directed staff to administer medications as ordered. The physician’s order specified Lantus SoloStar 10 units SQ in the morning. During observation of a medication pass, an RN prepared the Lantus pen by attaching a needle and dialing the dose to 10 units, then administered the injection in the resident’s lower left abdomen without priming the pen. In an interview, the RN stated she checked the pen for air bubbles and did not know any other way of priming the Lantus pen. The Lantus SoloStar instruction leaflet specifies that a safety test must be performed before each injection, including selecting a 2‑unit dose, removing caps, holding the pen needle-up, tapping to move air bubbles, pressing the injection button, and confirming insulin comes out and the dose window returns to 0. This required priming procedure was not followed prior to administering the insulin.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙