Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Initiate Timely Wound Care for Admitted Resident With Sacral Pressure Ulcer

Fayetteville, North Carolina Survey Completed on 03-13-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to initiate and document pressure ulcer treatment for a newly admitted resident with a known sacral pressure injury for four days following admission. The resident was admitted with type 2 diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, dependence on staff for hygiene, mobility, and transfers, and an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer documented as present on admission. The admission MDS and skin assessment identified the sacral pressure ulcer and noted a clean, dry dressing, but the skin assessment did not include wound measurements. Review of the medical record and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed no wound care orders or documented sacral wound treatment on the four days immediately following admission. On a later date, a wound care order was entered on the TAR for daily cleansing of the sacrum and application of medical grade honey for a Stage 3 pressure injury, and this order was then discontinued and replaced the same day with a new order for cleansing, Santyl, and quarter-strength antimicrobial-moistened gauze for an unstageable pressure injury. Interviews with the former Wound Treatment Nurse, Corporate Nurse Consultant, Medical Director, and Wound PA confirmed there was no evidence that wound care orders had been implemented or that staff had contacted a provider or the wound care company for wound treatment orders during the four-day gap after admission, despite standing orders that required MD or wound specialist orders for Stage 3 and 4 wounds. The Wound PA noted that weekly wound evaluations began only after the initial wound consult, and there was no documentation that facility staff had reached out to the consulting company prior to that evaluation.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙