Unclean and Worn Unit Environment
Summary
The facility did not maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on Unit 2 AB in the neurobehavioral building. Survey observations found the dining room with heavily worn tables and chairs, chipped and broken edges, torn and stained upholstery, a stained and soiled accordion divider, discolored floors with stains and brown scruff marks, grime in floor corners, dust and dirt on radiators and vent grills, and three steam tables with nonfunctioning indicator lights, smudges, dried food residue/grease, mineral buildup, and rust. The television room was also observed with an exposed radiator without a cover, a sofa with a broken frame sagging to the floor, damaged tables, ripped chair cushions, and streaked, scruffed floors. Resident rooms on the unit were observed with discolored or stained floors, dusty privacy curtains and windowsills, closets missing locks or handles, peeled sticker residue, dusty or unsecured air conditioning equipment, rusty bed frames and legs, rusty handrails, torn or damaged chairs, missing dresser drawers, and bathroom or shower stall tiles discolored and ingrained with grime. Multiple rooms also had wooden closets with scratches, scruff marks, sticker residue, and missing locks. These conditions were documented across several rooms and common areas during repeated observations of the unit. Staff interviews confirmed that housekeeping and maintenance staff were aware of the environmental concerns. The housekeeper stated they cleaned resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas daily and acknowledged that the building and furniture conditions still made the areas look dull and not clean. The maintenance worker stated no work requests had been received for the observed issues and that worn furniture or structural damage requiring major construction would be addressed by administration. The Director of Maintenance and Housekeeping acknowledged the environmental and maintenance concerns and stated they had not yet completed routine rounding in the neurobehavioral building, while the Administrator stated the team had been discussing the concerns and had work to do to fix the areas.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.