Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Provide Ordered Oxygen Therapy and Maintain Readily Available O2 Equipment

Rio Rancho, New Mexico Survey Completed on 02-11-2026

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards for two residents who required or potentially required oxygen (O2) therapy. For one resident with impaired gas exchange related to respiratory failure and pulmonary edema, physician progress notes over several weeks documented fluctuating O2 needs, including low O2 saturations on room air, use of O2 at 1–4 LPM, and instructions to continue O2 supplementation and wean as tolerated. However, on the date of survey observation, the resident was seen outside the room without O2, and the bedside oxygen concentrator was present but turned off and without tubing attached. The physician’s orders on that date referenced only a room air trial, with no active or discontinued O2 orders in the record. Nursing progress notes were inconsistent, alternately documenting no O2 in use and O2 via nasal cannula on different days, and the resident’s care plan, while addressing impaired gas exchange, did not include O2 use as an intervention. The MDS for this resident also lacked documentation of O2 use. The DON stated her expectation that O2 use be ordered in the EHR and reflected in the care plan and MDS. For the second resident, admitted with Parkinson’s disease, dysphagia, and weakness, physician orders directed O2 at 1–4 LPM via nasal cannula as needed. Despite this standing PRN order, surveyors twice observed that no O2 equipment was present in the resident’s room on separate days. During interview, the DON confirmed that the resident had an order for O2 at 1–4 LPM as needed and stated her expectation that appropriate O2 equipment should be present and available in the resident’s room. These findings show that the facility did not ensure ordered O2 therapy was administered per provider orders for one resident and did not ensure necessary respiratory equipment was readily available for another resident with an active O2 order.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙