Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Inconsistent Code Status Documentation in Advance Directives

Rio Rancho, New Mexico Survey Completed on 02-11-2026

Penalty

Fine: $17,215
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident’s advance directive information was accurate and consistent across the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and related documents. Record review showed that the resident’s face sheet listed the code status as Full Code at admission, indicating that lifesaving procedures were desired. The resident’s care plan, dated 11/03/25, also documented the resident as Full Code. However, the New Mexico Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (NM MOST) form for the same resident, dated 05/05/23, identified the resident as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), indicating that lifesaving measures were not desired. During an interview, the DON acknowledged that the NM MOST form documented the resident as DNR while the face sheet and care plan documented the resident as Full Code. The DON confirmed that the resident’s correct code status was Full Code and stated that her expectation was that a resident’s code status be accurate and consistent across all documentation. The DON further stated that the NM MOST form was inaccurate and should not have been, confirming the inconsistency in the resident’s end-of-life documentation.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙