Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0695
D

Failure to Specify Oxygen Administration Parameters in Physician Order

Hobbs, New Mexico Survey Completed on 03-12-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide respiratory care in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring that a resident’s oxygen order specified how it was to be administered. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including dementia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, seizure disorder, and COPD. Record review showed a physician’s order dated 02/24/26 for oxygen at 1–3 LPM via nasal cannula using an oxygen concentrator and/or oxygen tank, but the order did not indicate whether the oxygen was to be given continuously or on an as-needed basis. During an observation in the activity room on 03/10/26, the resident was seen wearing a nasal cannula connected to a portable oxygen concentrator. In a subsequent interview on 03/12/26, the DON confirmed that the oxygen order for this resident did not specify the frequency of use, such as as-needed or continuous, and acknowledged that it should have included this information. This lack of specificity in the physician’s order constituted the failure to provide respiratory care according to professional standards for this resident.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙