Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Implement Grievance Process for Resident’s Missing Tablet

Jefferson City, Missouri Survey Completed on 03-26-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to follow the facility’s grievance protocol when a cognitively intact resident reported a missing tablet. The facility’s undated Grievance Protocol policy stated that the purpose of the Grievance/Complaint Report and Grievance Log is to provide a written record of each resident and family concern and to ensure proper follow-up through appropriate disciplines, with the Social Service Director (SSD) responsible for the program and the administrator ultimately responsible for its implementation. The policy specified that a Grievance Complaint Report should be used for situations involving lost or unlocatable resident articles, including ongoing concerns about lost items and laundry issues, and that the SSD would obtain the original report and forward a copy to the appropriate discipline. Review of the grievance log showed an entry indicating the resident had reported a missing tablet and that staff were searching for the item, but there was no documentation that a grievance form had been completed or that a copy had been provided to the resident or guardian. During interviews, the resident stated the tablet had been missing for about a month, that he/she had reported it to an unknown staff member, and that he/she had not been given a resolution. The SSD reported that staff were directed to report grievances to him/her or to direct residents to do so, but acknowledged not considering a missing item to be a grievance and therefore did not complete a grievance form or provide a copy to the resident. The SSD confirmed the tablet was not found or replaced and that the resident had not been provided with a resolution, and also stated being newer to the position and not recalling training on the grievance process. The administrator stated the SSD was responsible for completing a grievance form, providing it to the resident, and giving a resolution within twenty-four hours, and acknowledged that the resident’s tablet had not been replaced and that the resident should have had a resolution but it “slipped through the cracks.”

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙