Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Document, Track, and Resolve Resident Grievances Raised in Resident Council

Lebanon, Missouri Survey Completed on 03-16-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement an effective and complete grievance policy, including failure to document, track, and promptly resolve residents’ grievances, and failure to provide written summaries of conclusions regarding grievances raised in resident council. The facility’s written Grievance Protocol states that the SSD is responsible for the grievance program, that grievances are to be recorded on a monthly grievance log, and that the Administrator and SSD are to evaluate the log for trends and develop action plans. Despite this, the facility’s grievance/complaint log contained no entries for three consecutive months, even though multiple concerns were documented in resident council minutes during that same period. Resident council minutes over several meetings documented repeated complaints and concerns from residents that met the facility’s own definition of grievances. These included reports of call lights not being answered in a timely manner, a CNA refusing to assist with compression socks and displaying a bad attitude, missing personal items such as sweatpants, coats, blankets, and a horse blanket, trash on floors in rooms and hallways, lack of hot water, no towels or wash rags, staff not knocking before entering rooms, flies, Hoyer lifts left in rooms, staff playing with their hair in the dining room, two-hour checks not being done, no shower aides resulting in no showers, and staff talking nastily to residents and showing bad attitudes. The resident council minutes for January, February, and March all showed that staff did not document any resolution of these concerns. Interviews with staff and leadership showed inconsistent understanding and implementation of the grievance process and confirmed that grievances raised in resident council were not being entered into the grievance log or consistently investigated. RN E stated grievances should be documented but was not aware of any grievances filed. The SSD reported that grievances should be referred to department heads and logged, but was unaware of the complaints documented in the resident council minutes and stated that he/she would only complete a grievance form if residents came directly to him/her. The AD stated that grievances were documented in resident council minutes, were sometimes taken to department heads, and were discussed in morning meetings, but was unaware of any grievance log and acknowledged complaints were not always handled immediately. The DON believed the SSD kept a grievance log and distinguished between formal grievances and undocumented complaints, while the Administrator stated grievances should be filed with the SSD, documented, and logged, but was unaware of specific complaints about staff and repeated call light issues documented in resident council. Together, these findings show that grievances voiced by residents were not consistently documented, tracked, or resolved in accordance with the facility’s grievance policy.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙