Failure to Monitor and Assess Dialysis Residents and Educate Nursing Staff
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide dialysis care and monitoring consistent with professional standards for multiple residents receiving hemodialysis at an outside provider. Three residents with end stage renal disease or dependence on renal dialysis (R1, R5, and R7) had physician orders and care plans indicating the need for ongoing dialysis and specific monitoring for complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage, bacteremia, septic shock, renal insufficiency, infection at the access site, and peripheral edema. Despite these documented needs and interventions, the treatment administration records (TARs) for these residents did not include dialysis-related ongoing monitoring before and after dialysis treatments, and the facility’s Clinical Monitoring–Dialysis UDA assessments were not completed on multiple dialysis days listed in the report. For R1, hospital records documented end stage renal disease on dialysis with a left arm AV fistula and a schedule of hemodialysis three times per week. The care plan included detailed nursing interventions to monitor and document for dialysis-related complications and to encourage attendance at scheduled dialysis appointments. However, the TAR for the period reviewed did not identify dialysis monitoring for complications, and progress notes only briefly noted that the resident was out to dialysis, without additional assessment data. The record also did not show completion of the Clinical Monitoring–Dialysis UDA on the specified dialysis date. For R5, progress notes repeatedly documented a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis and referenced ongoing dialysis three times per week, including multiple entries noting the resident’s return from dialysis with statements such as “no new orders,” “vital signs normal,” “denied shortness of breath,” and “no signs or symptoms of discomfort.” The care plan again listed specific monitoring interventions for edema, bleeding, infection, and renal insufficiency, and the MDS documented dependence on renal dialysis. Nonetheless, the TAR for the reviewed month did not include dialysis monitoring for complications, and the Clinical Monitoring–Dialysis UDA was not completed on numerous dialysis dates identified in the report. For R7, progress notes documented dependence on renal dialysis and multiple instances of the resident being at dialysis or returning from dialysis, with limited narrative such as noting attendance at dialysis or that there were no new orders and no complaints of pain. The care plan required monitoring and documentation for peripheral edema, bleeding, bacteremia, septic shock, renal insufficiency, infection at the access site, and depression, and the MDS recorded chronic kidney disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Despite these documented needs, the TAR did not show dialysis-related ongoing monitoring, and the Clinical Monitoring–Dialysis UDA was not completed on multiple dialysis dates. The resident reported that nurses did not check the access site before and after dialysis and did not complete an assessment upon return from dialysis. The deficiency also includes a systemic failure to ensure that licensed nurses had appropriate education to care for and assess residents receiving dialysis. Personnel records for 26 of 34 licensed nurses lacked onboarding orientation checklists identifying dialysis education. In interviews, several RNs stated they had not received training on dialysis residents or that their understanding of complications was limited to bleeding at the access site or changes in vital signs. One RN reported that after a resident returns from dialysis, she only takes vital signs and does not complete any other assessment, and another RN acknowledged that if a dialysis assessment is not present in the chart, it means it was not completed. The clinical learning and development specialist and the administrator confirmed that dialysis-specific education was not provided at the corporate level and that training, if any, was left to individual facilities, while also stating that the expectation was for nurses to complete a dialysis assessment in the chart after treatment. The absence of documented dialysis assessments and the lack of structured dialysis education for most licensed nurses contributed directly to the failure to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Incomplete Dialysis Communication Documentation: The facility failed to fully complete the dialysis communication sheet for a resident receiving dialysis services. An LPN stated staff completed assessments and communication sheets before dialysis and upon return, while the DON said staff were expected to complete the sheets completely. Review showed multiple return-from-dialysis sections were left blank, and no earlier communication sheets were provided.
Failure to Document Post-Dialysis Assessment: A resident with ESRD who received hemodialysis twice weekly returned from treatment and reported staff rarely assessed her afterward or checked her chest port. The RN confirmed a pre- and post-dialysis assessment should have been completed and documented on the Dialysis Communication Form, but no post-dialysis assessment was found in the EMR and there was no evidence the resident refused care.
Incomplete Post-Dialysis Assessment Documentation: A resident with DM, COPD, and dependence on dialysis had repeated missing post-HD assessments on the dialysis communication sheet. The care plan and MD orders included dialysis attendance, AV fistula/graft monitoring, and pre-dialysis weights, but staff stated the resident was to be assessed after returning from dialysis and documented on the communication sheet; however, post-dialysis documentation was absent on many dialysis dates.
A resident with ESRD, DM2, and dependence on dialysis missed a scheduled hemodialysis treatment because transport was not arranged after a hospital return. The resident was observed waiting in the lobby for pickup, and staff later stated the dialysis center had not been updated about the hospitalization. The SSD and RT both acknowledged the facility was responsible for notifying the dialysis center and arranging transport, and the dialysis agreement and dialysis monitoring policy reflected that responsibility.
Failure to Monitor Fluid Restriction for a Resident Receiving Dialysis: A resident with ESRD, dependence on renal dialysis, and pleural effusion had a physician-ordered 1200 ml/day fluid restriction, but the MAR and record review showed no documentation of oral intake monitoring. The RNS stated she could not find intake monitoring documentation and noted the resident also lacked a care plan for the fluid restriction, despite facility P&P requiring intake/output documentation and a plan of care for residents on fluid restrictions.
A resident receiving PD was involved in a procedure where an RN did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves, entered the room without closing the door, and then put on a mask from the resident’s bedside table while continuing the same procedure. The facility’s PD disconnecting procedure required the door to be closed, a mask to be applied, and hand hygiene to be performed before gloves were applied, and the RN had not received facility training related to the resident’s PD.
Incomplete Dialysis Communication Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete the dialysis communication sheet for one resident who required dialysis services. The resident had a physician order dated 5/20/2026 for dialysis at a third-party dialysis provider on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday, with a 7:00 AM pickup time and 7:30 AM chair time, transported by wheelchair. Review of the resident’s dialysis communication forms showed that the section for facility completion upon return from dialysis was not completed on 8/8/2026, 8/6/2026, 8/4/2026, 8/1/2026, and 7/28/2026, and no other communication sheets were provided prior to 7/28/2026. Staff interviews indicated that an LPN completed assessments and communication sheets before dialysis and upon return, and the DON stated that staff were expected to complete the communication sheets completely and that progress notes would be on the communication sheet. The facility policy titled Clinical Dialysis Management stated that facility personnel will provide information useful or necessary for the resident’s care to the dialysis center as needed.
Failure to Document Post-Dialysis Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete and document a post-hemodialysis assessment for a resident with end-stage renal disease who received dialysis twice weekly and had intact cognition with no refusal of care documented. The resident’s care plan noted that she returned from dialysis tired, often went straight to her room to nap, and required monitoring for increased fatigue and assistance with activities of daily living and mobility as needed. Her EMR also included orders related to her chest port dressing, including routine dressing changes and sterile care instructions. On the day in question, the resident returned from dialysis and stated that staff rarely assessed her when she came back from treatment and did not check her port. She exposed the chest port during the interview, and the dressing was dry and intact without bleeding or drainage. Review of the resident’s progress notes, evaluation notes, and EMR found no documentation of a post-dialysis assessment, and there was no evidence that she refused the assessment. The nurse on duty confirmed that a pre- and post-dialysis assessment should have been completed and documented on the Dialysis Communication Form, but she could not locate the form for that day and stated she did not recall seeing it when the resident returned.
Incomplete Post-Dialysis Assessment Documentation
Penalty
Summary
Safe, appropriate dialysis care/services were not provided for a resident who required hemodialysis. The resident had diagnoses of DM, COPD, dependence on dialysis, and dependence on supplemental oxygen, and the MDS documented a BIMS score of 15 with dialysis received during the observation period. The care plan included interventions for dialysis attendance, shunt monitoring, blood pressure precautions for the shunt arm, and daily weights, but the dialysis-related documentation was incomplete. The physician orders included dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, readiness for dialysis by 10:30 AM, monitoring of the AV fistula/graft site upon return from dialysis, and weighing before dialysis for fluid management. Review of the Dialysis Communication Form from 05/01/2026 through 08/03/2026 revealed 41 dialysis communication sheets, and post-dialysis documentation was missing on 25 dates. The facility’s staff stated the resident would be assessed upon return from dialysis and documented on the dialysis communication sheet, and administrative staff stated the charge nurse was expected to complete and document the post-return assessment. The facility’s Hemodialysis policy stated it would provide care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice, physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident’s goals and preferences.
Missed Dialysis Transport for Resident Requiring Hemodialysis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident who required hemodialysis was transported to treatment. Resident #106 was admitted with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis, end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and end stage renal disease. The care plan identified that he was dependent on dialysis and received hemodialysis three times a week. He had a BIMS score of 13, indicating no cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living with impaired upper and lower extremities bilaterally. After the resident returned from the hospital, physician orders continued hemodialysis three times weekly with a 6:15 A.M. pickup time and instruction to be in the lobby at 5:15 A.M. On the morning of the missed treatment, the resident was observed waiting in his wheelchair in the lobby and later stated he was waiting for dialysis transport. Staff later told him he had missed the appointment because transportation had not been set up. The SSD stated it was the facility's responsibility to call and alert the dialysis center of updates, including hospitalizations. The RT stated the dialysis transport was automatic, but when the resident transferred to the hospital the facility did not update the dialysis center, and the center stopped coming after unsuccessful pickup attempts. The facility's dialysis transfer agreement stated it was responsible for arranging transportation to and from the dialysis center, and the dialysis monitoring policy stated the facility would maintain the safety and health of residents receiving dialysis services.
Failure to Monitor Fluid Restriction for a Resident Receiving Dialysis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor the fluid restriction for Resident 10, who was admitted and readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including ESRD, dependence on renal dialysis, and pleural effusion. The resident’s MDS dated 6/26/2026 indicated moderate cognitive impairment and dependence for multiple activities of daily living, with setup or clean-up assistance needed for eating and oral hygiene. A physician order dated 7/10/2026 specified a fluid restriction of 1200 ml per day, but during review of the MAR on 7/23/2026, there was no documentation of the resident’s oral intake to show that the restriction was being monitored. The RNS stated she could not find any documentation of oral intake monitoring and also stated the resident did not have a care plan reflecting the 1200 ml fluid restriction. The facility’s P&P for Fluid Restriction required intake and output documentation and a plan of care for residents on fluid restrictions, and the Dialysis Management P&P stated that diet and fluid restrictions would be followed as ordered and documented in the medical record.
Failure to Follow PD Disconnect Procedure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent potential complications from a dialysis access site for one resident receiving peritoneal dialysis. The facility’s procedure for disconnecting PD directed staff to close the resident’s door, apply a mask, and then wash hands and apply gloves before accessing the PD port. During observation of the resident’s PD disconnecting procedure, a registered nurse placed gloves on without performing hand hygiene, entered the resident’s room without closing the door, and then applied a mask from the resident’s bedside table while continuing the procedure with the same gloves. The record also showed that the nurse had not received any facility training related to the resident’s PD.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.