Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0757
D

PRN Diphenhydramine Order Lacked Indication for Use

Lenexa, Kansas Survey Completed on 03-18-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Surveyors identified a deficiency related to unnecessary medications when a resident had a PRN diphenhydramine order without an associated diagnosis or documented reason for use. The resident’s EMR showed diagnoses of insomnia and anxiety, an Annual MDS with a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition, no skin issues, and independence with ADLs. The Psychotropic Drug Use CAA noted the resident was prescribed psychotropic medications for anxiety and would be closely monitored. However, the care plan dated 03/16/26 did not include diphenhydramine, and a physician order dated 11/12/25 directed administration of diphenhydramine 50 mg by mouth three times a day as needed, without specifying an indication. Review of the EMR from 11/12/25 through 03/17/26 showed no documentation of this PRN diphenhydramine order in progress notes, provider notes, dermatology notes, pharmacy notes, or psychiatric notes. During observations, the resident was seen independently ambulating, participating in activities, and reporting that she did not know all of her medications but would ask the nurse if she needed something, stating she had many options to choose from. The consultant pharmacist confirmed on 03/17/26 that the PRN diphenhydramine order lacked a reason or diagnosis and acknowledged missing this issue during the last medication review. A CMA, a licensed nurse, and an administrative nurse each stated that all medications, including PRNs, were required to have a diagnosis or reason for administration, and the administrative nurse acknowledged that the diphenhydramine order should have included a reason since its initiation on 11/12/25. The facility did not provide a policy on PRN medication orders.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙