Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0803
D

Failure to Provide Ordered Double Meal Portions per Resident Preference

Terre Haute, Indiana Survey Completed on 03-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to honor a resident’s meal preference for larger portions despite a physician’s order and the resident’s repeated requests. During an initial interview, Resident J reported that he had asked for more food with his meals for quite some time but continued to receive regular, small portions and felt hungry between meals. Observation of his lunch tray showed that he did not receive double portions when compared to a regular tray, and his meal ticket did not document any order for double portions. Record review showed that Resident J had COPD, unspecified dementia with moderate cognitive deficit, required set-up assistance with eating, and was care planned as being at risk for malnutrition, with interventions including meals as ordered by the physician. A physician’s order dated 1/26/26 directed that he receive a regular diet with double portions per his request. Interviews and documentation revealed confusion and lack of clarity in the dietary system for indicating portion sizes and special meal preferences. The Dietary Manager initially stated that the resident’s ticket showed “4 HLF,” which she said meant double portions, while regular tickets showed “2 HLF,” but the observed lunch tray did not reflect double portions, and the resident choice meal tickets did not show any deviation in portion size. Two dietary staff members reported they did not know what “2 HLF” and “4 HLF” meant and indicated that double portions should be explicitly written on the ticket. The Registered Dietician confirmed there was an issue with meal tickets not clearly indicating portion sizes or special resident choice meals, and that the resident’s ticket did not indicate double portions. The facility’s Resident Rights policy stated that residents’ individuality and input through self-determination would be respected, but Resident J’s expressed preference and physician-ordered double portions were not implemented as ordered.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙