Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Wandering Behavior and Wander Guard Use

Windsor Locks, Connecticut Survey Completed on 03-03-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a resident’s Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident’s behavioral status and use of a wander/elopement alarm. The resident had diagnoses of vascular dementia with behavior disturbances and depression, was cognitively impaired with poor decision-making skills, and had been identified on an elopement risk evaluation as ambulating independently and displaying behaviors that could indicate attempts to leave the facility. The resident’s care plan, initiated on the same date as the elopement risk evaluation, documented that the resident was at risk for wandering/elopement, had been observed near exterior doors, and required a wander guard device on the ankle with placement and function to be checked every shift. A physician’s order also directed that a wander guard device be applied to the resident’s ankle and checked every shift. Despite these documented behaviors and interventions, the annual MDS assessment coded the resident as having severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score 6/15) but no pacing or wandering behaviors, and indicated the resident ambulated independently with supervision using a walker. In Section E (Behavior), the MDS was coded to show delusions but no wandering behaviors, and in Section P (Restraints and Alarms), it was coded to show that no wander/elopement alarm was used. During interview, the DON stated that the resident’s baseline behavior was to always wander up and down the hallways and that the MDS nurse should use assessments, care plans, and progress notes to ensure accurate MDS coding. The DON acknowledged that the MDS did not accurately reflect the resident’s behaviors, and the facility did not provide a specific policy on MDS accuracy, only a general documentation policy stating that nursing documentation must be accurate, timely, complete, and reflective of the care provided.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙