Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Resident-to-Resident Sexual Incident

Meriden, Connecticut Survey Completed on 03-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to conduct a thorough investigation following a resident-to-resident sexual incident. Resident #1, admitted in December 2014 with vascular dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder, had severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 4), was dependent for personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing, and used a wheelchair. Resident #1’s care plan identified a history of engaging in non-consensual sexual advances by others, with interventions including close observation as indicated per policy. Resident #2, admitted in July 2008 with vascular dementia, schizophrenia, and anxiety disorder, also had severely impaired cognition (BIMS score of 6), required set-up/clean-up assistance for personal and oral hygiene and toileting, and ambulated independently. Resident #2’s care plan noted dementia-related memory and thinking problems, with interventions to avoid correcting the resident’s believed statements and to provide simple responses. On the date of the incident, a Recreation Assistant observed Resident #1 and Resident #2 kissing in an elevator, with Resident #2’s hands in Resident #1’s pants, and this was documented on a Reportable Event Form by the DNS. The facility’s investigation included interviews with the witness (Recreation Assistant) and both residents, but did not include interviews or statements from other staff to determine how long the residents had been unsupervised or their locations prior to the incident. Subsequent interviews with a NA assigned to Resident #2 and an LPN assigned to Resident #1 revealed each had last seen their assigned resident around early afternoon, but these interviews were not part of the original investigation. The DNS acknowledged that the investigation should have included staff interviews to establish a timeline and resident whereabouts, as required by the facility’s “Reportable Events-Reporting Allegations and Incidents; Investigation (CT)” policy, which directs identifying and interviewing staff who were potential witnesses and reviewing work schedules, with efforts to interview staff before the end of their shifts.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙