Kitchen Staff Lacked Competency in Puree Diet Testing, Food Thawing, and QUAT Mixing
Summary
The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency in food and nutrition service functions. During a puree diet test tray observation with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Registered Dietitian (RD), the puree Jello was observed to have lumps. The DS stated puree foods should be an applesauce-like consistency and smooth to swallow, and said the consistency was determined by seeing and tasting the food. The DS could not identify any other test used to confirm proper texture and consistency, and stated she was the one providing in-services to staff with the RD. The facility’s diet manual stated IDDSI Level 4 pureed foods must be smooth, free of lumps, hold their shape, and pass IDDSI Level 4 testing requirements, including appearance, fork drip, and spoon tilt tests. The DS’s competency checklist did not specifically indicate competency in IDDSI testing methods. The facility also failed to ensure staff were trained and competent in safe thawing of food. Dietary staff were observed thawing chicken, tilapia, turkey, and fish in the kitchen sink under running water. One cook stated chicken had been thawed in the sink with running water after being moved from the refrigerator, and said she did not check the temperature during thawing or before cooking and had not attended in-services on thawing food. Another cook stated tilapia and turkey had been out for 45 minutes and were for that day’s use. The DS described thawing as placing food in the sink under room temperature running water, while the RD stated the safest method was under refrigeration and that thawing in the sink should be done with cold running water at 70 F or below for a maximum of 2 hours. During observation, the RD measured the running water used for thawing fish at 77 F and stated it should be below 70 F; the fish temperature was observed at 69 F. The facility’s thawing policy required food to be thawed under potable running water at 70 F or lower, and the record review showed no in-service training about the thawing process during the reviewed period. The facility further failed to ensure proper mixing of QUAT sanitizer. During observation, a Dietary Aide/Dishwasher stated the red bucket contained QUAT sanitizer for sanitizing the cart and said he mixed it using 5 liters of water to 75 milliliters of sanitizer. The DS stated the correct ratio was 4 quarts of water to 7.5 milliliters of sanitizer based on manufacturer guidance, and stated the ratio used by the aide would be diluted and would not achieve the required 200-400 ppm concentration. The facility’s red bucket policy required QUAT sanitizer to be prepared according to manufacturer instructions and maintained at 200-400 ppm. The aide’s competency checklist did not include how to mix QUAT sanitizer to water, and the record review showed no in-service training about mixing QUAT sanitizer during the reviewed period.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.