Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Timely Report and Act on Resident Abuse Allegation

Sylmar, California Survey Completed on 03-26-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to immediately report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the Administrator, the State Survey Agency (CDPH), the Ombudsman, and local law enforcement within the required two-hour timeframe. The involved resident, identified as Resident 20, had multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, legal blindness, and adult failure to thrive, and was assessed as having severely impaired cognition. According to the Minimum Data Set, the resident required extensive assistance with most activities of daily living. The History and Physical indicated that the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. On the early morning in question, at approximately 4:30 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 was providing ADL care to Resident 20 when the resident accused CNA 6 of hitting her during care and continued to scream and repeat the accusation. CNA 6 acknowledged that such an accusation should be considered an allegation of abuse but did not report it to the charge nurse because she believed she had not hit the resident. CNA 6 continued providing care, then left to care for another resident without notifying supervisory staff. CNA 5, who was caring for the resident’s roommate, later observed Resident 20 upset and crying and heard her state in Spanish that CNA 6 was very rough with her. CNA 5 then informed Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 8 that the resident was upset and requested that LVN 8 speak with the resident. LVN 8 went to the room, found Resident 20 upset, and heard the resident state that she had been hit by a CNA, but LVN 8 did not ask the resident to identify which CNA was involved. LVN 8 checked the resident for injuries, found none, and then resumed medication administration without reporting the allegation to the Administrator or Director of Nursing and without removing the alleged perpetrator from the assignment. Later that morning, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was informed by the nurse assigned to Resident 20 that the roommate reported hearing a slapping sound while Resident 20 was receiving care and that Resident 20 said she had been hit on the face by CNA 6. The ADON confirmed through interviews with CNA 5, CNA 6, and LVN 8 that the allegation occurred between approximately 4:30 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. The Administrator was not made aware of the allegation until about 9:15 a.m., at which time she learned that CNA 6 had not reported the allegation, CNA 5 had only reported to LVN 8, and LVN 8 had not escalated the allegation. The facility’s abuse policy required that any suspicion or allegation of abuse be reported immediately to the Administrator and to CDPH, the Ombudsman, and law enforcement within two hours, and that any employee accused of abuse be removed from resident contact until the investigation was complete; these requirements were not followed in this incident. The Director of Staff Development, ADON, and Administrator each confirmed during interviews that all staff are mandated reporters and that any allegation of abuse, regardless of perceived validity, must be reported immediately to the Administrator so that external reporting can occur within two hours. They also confirmed that the accused staff member should be removed from the assignment and from resident contact pending investigation. In this case, CNA 6 did not report the allegation to the nurse, CNA 5 did not report directly to the Administrator, and LVN 8 did not notify the Administrator or remove CNA 6 from caring for the resident. As a result, the facility did not follow its own policy and regulatory requirements for timely reporting of an abuse allegation involving Resident 20.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙