Indwelling catheter care failures for two residents
Summary
The facility failed to provide proper catheter care and services for two residents with indwelling urinary catheters. Resident 47 was admitted and later readmitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, dysphagia, and orthostatic hypotension. The resident’s MDS indicated moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, dependence for oral/toileting hygiene, showering, dressing, and bed mobility, and the presence of an indwelling catheter. During a concurrent observation and interview, Resident 47’s foley catheter drainage bag was observed touching the floor and was not covered with a dignity bag. CNA 9 stated the drainage bag should not touch the floor. TN 1 stated bacteria can enter the drainage bag if it touches the floor, causing infection, and that staff were responsible for ensuring the bag stayed off the floor. The facility’s catheter care policy stated the catheter tubing and drainage bag should be kept off the floor. Resident 24 was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including obstructive and reflux uropathy, unilateral inguinal hernia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. The resident’s MDS indicated moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, need for supervision or touching assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, sit-to-stand, and toilet transfer, partial/moderate assistance with bathing and dressing, and use of an indwelling catheter. The physician order summary directed use of a 16 Fr/10 cc foley catheter, monthly catheter changes, and leg bag changes every Sunday and as needed. During observation and interview, Resident 24 stated he smelled like urine because staff did not always empty his urine bag when full and that he sometimes had to empty it himself because the leg bag disconnected when it became too full. TN 1 stated the leg bag was frequently changed because it would disconnect, and CNA 5 stated the bag was sometimes full at the start of the shift and should be emptied at least twice per shift to prevent disconnection. During the leg bag change, TN 1 and TN 2 used non-sterile gloves and gowns, but TN 1 did not clean the catheter connection site before disconnecting and reconnecting the new leg bag. TN 1 and TN 2 stated aseptic technique should have been followed, and TN 1 acknowledged the connection site should have been cleaned with alcohol before the change. The record and observation also showed Resident 24 had an 18 Fr foley catheter inserted instead of the ordered 16 Fr catheter, and the catheter was not secured with a device. TN 2 stated the catheter had never been secured, and TN 1 stated she did not know why the larger catheter was inserted. The DON stated the catheter should have been emptied every shift or as needed when full, aseptic technique should have been used, and the catheter should have been secured to prevent tugging and accidental dislodgement.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.