Failure to Provide and Document Ordered Restorative Nursing and ROM Services
Summary
The facility failed to ensure rehabilitation and restorative nursing services were provided as ordered for four sampled residents with limited range of motion and mobility needs. The report identified deficiencies involving Resident 11, Resident 28, Resident 16, and Resident 69, each of whom had diagnoses and assessments showing functional impairments, contractures, or dependence in activities of daily living. The facility did not carry out ordered restorative interventions, did not consistently document or provide the ordered services, and in some cases did not notify the appropriate departments when the ordered care could not be completed. Resident 11 had diagnoses including palliative care, cachexia, contracture of the left hand, and an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer. The MDS showed moderately impaired decision-making and functional ROM impairments in both upper and lower extremities, with substantial assistance needed for ADLs. The Joint Mobility Assessment documented severe and moderate ROM limitations in multiple joints, but the medical record did not show care plans addressing those ROM limitations. The PT stated Resident 11 was under hospice care and therefore did not receive a rehabilitation evaluation, and the facility practice was not to provide RNA services to residents under hospice care. Resident 11 and his representative both stated he wanted ROM exercises, and the PT stated gentle passive ROM could have benefited him. Resident 28 had diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, and hypertensive heart disease, with the MDS showing moderately impaired cognition, ROM limitations in the upper and lower extremities, and substantial assistance needed for ADLs. The care plan directed staff to carry out the RNA program as ordered, and the physician orders included right elbow splinting, bilateral lower extremity PROM, pain monitoring before splinting, bilateral upper extremity AAROM, and bilateral hand rolls. During repeated observations, the resident did not have the hand rolls or right arm splint in place and stated staff did not provide ROM exercises that day. RNA staff later stated the hand rolls were not applied as ordered, bandages were placed in the palms instead, the right elbow splint was not applied because the resident could not tolerate it, and the charge nurse was not notified. Resident 16 had diagnoses including polyneuropathy, a right femur fracture, contractures of both ankles, and muscle disorders. The MDS showed severe cognitive impairment, ROM limitations in the upper and lower extremities, and total dependence for ADLs. The physician orders required bilateral lower extremity gentle PROM, bilateral lower extremity PRAFO boots, and upper extremity AAROM. The resident was observed in bed without PRAFO boots on multiple occasions. RNA staff stated the boots were not applied as ordered and that the documentation for the RNA orders was unclear, even though the boots were ordered to maintain foot positioning and prevent further contractures and heel pressure ulcers. Resident 69 had diagnoses including spondylopathy, bilateral lower extremity amputations, and a T7-T8 wedge compression fracture. The MDS showed moderately impaired cognition, lower extremity impairment, and substantial assistance needed for multiple ADLs. The physician ordered RNA sit-to-stand activity with the left below-knee prosthesis only. The resident refused therapy on some days and only partially participated on others, but the RNA task flow sheet showed refusals and passive participation rather than completion of the ordered activity. RNA staff stated the resident did not want to complete the full sit-to-stand order and that the rehab and nursing departments should have been notified when the resident refused or did not complete the therapy. The DOR and DON both stated they were unaware of the refusals and passive participation and that the resident did not receive the full rehabilitation he required.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.