Respiratory Care Orders Not Followed
Summary
The facility failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for four residents who were receiving ventilator or oxygen therapy. The report identified deficiencies involving Resident 7, Resident 10, Resident 12, and Resident 25, each of whom had physician orders and care plans related to respiratory support. The findings were based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policies and procedures. Resident 25 had a physician order for aerosol mist to the tracheostomy via T-piece or trach mask at 60% FIO2 and a care plan addressing altered respiratory status due to tracheostomy, chronic respiratory failure, and traumatic brain injury. During an observed transfer from a Geri-chair to bed using a Hoyer lift, the resident was suspended on the sling and was not receiving supplemental oxygen. The corrugated breathing tubing was observed disconnected from the tracheostomy piece, and the CNA performing the transfer stated she noticed the tubing was disconnected when the resident was moved onto the lift. RN 5 later reconnected the tubing and obtained an oxygen saturation of 93% while the resident was receiving 60% FIO2. RN 5 stated the resident required continuous oxygen therapy and should not have been without it during the transfer. Resident 10 had a physician order for mechanical ventilator settings including tidal volume 450, assist control 18, FIO2 35%, and PEEP 5. When observed, the resident was connected to a ventilator with an average peak airway pressure of 28 to 30, but the high-pressure alarm was set at 60 cm. RT 2 verified that the alarm setting was not in accordance with the facility policy, which required the high-pressure alarm to be set 15 to 20 cm of water pressure above the resident’s peak airway pressure, and adjusted it to 50. Resident 12 had an order for aerosol mist to the trach via T-piece or trach mask at FIO2 50%. The resident was observed with the cool aerosol adapter set at 50% FIO2/10 LPM, but the oxygen flowmeter attached to the T-piece was set at 8 LPM. RN 4 verified the setting should have been 10 LPM and was unable to adjust the flowmeter above 8 LPM, stating another flowmeter was needed. Resident 7 had physician orders to change the in-line suction catheter of the tracheostomy every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and to change the ventilator circuit set-up every two weeks and as needed if visibly soiled or malfunctioning. RT 1 stated the ventilator circuit set-up was being changed monthly and was not aware of the two-week order. RT 1 verified there was no documentation showing the ventilator circuit set-up was changed every two weeks, and the documentation for in-line suction catheter changes was incomplete. The Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Manager also verified there was no documentation showing the ventilator circuit set-up was changed per physician order and that documentation for the in-line suction catheter was not always completed.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release July 29, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.