Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
E

Failure to Follow Antihypertensive Medication Parameters and Document BPs

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 03-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that antihypertensive medication was administered in accordance with professional standards and the physician’s ordered parameters for one resident. The resident had diagnoses including dementia and hypertension and a physician’s order for losartan 50 mg by mouth once daily, with instructions to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure less than 100 or blood pressure less than 100/60. Review of the Medication Administration Records from mid-October through early March showed that losartan was documented as administered on most days, but there was no documentation of the resident’s blood pressure with each administration, and blood pressures were only recorded on six occasions that could possibly coincide with the losartan dosing. Review of the vitals documentation revealed no evidence that blood pressures were taken consistently prior to administering a medication with specific blood pressure parameters. Further review of the clinical record progress notes showed that on three dates the losartan was held and coded as “5=Hold See Progress Notes.” On two of those dates, the medication was held due to a pulse of 56, which was not included in the physician’s parameters for holding the medication. On the third date, the medication was held for a blood pressure of 99/54, which met the ordered hold parameters. During an interview, the DON stated she could not confirm that nurses consistently took the resident’s blood pressure before administering losartan and suggested that nurses may have taken blood pressures and written them on report sheets instead of documenting them in the clinical record. She confirmed that there should have been a corresponding documentation field with the medication administration to record the blood pressure and demonstrate that the physician’s ordered parameters were followed.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙