Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Failure to Keep Call Light Within Reach for Dependent Resident

Pocatello, Idaho Survey Completed on 02-24-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to reasonably accommodate a resident’s needs and preferences by not ensuring the resident’s call light was within reach, as required by the facility’s “Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response” policy dated 12/31/25, which states staff will ensure the call light is within reach of the resident and secured as needed. Resident #47, admitted with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and diabetes, was observed on 2/24/26 at 10:11 AM reclining in bed with the call light pinned to the headwall cord and not within her reach. At 10:12 AM, an RN confirmed that the call light should have been within the resident’s reach but was not. Later, at 12:24 PM, the RSN also stated that resident call lights should be within residents’ reach and acknowledged that in this instance it had not been. This deficiency was identified through policy review, observation, record review, and staff interviews, and involved 1 of 14 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident #47).

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙