Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0610
D

Inaccurate Identification of Victim and Aggressor in Abuse Report

Caldwell, Idaho Survey Completed on 03-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accurately report which resident was the victim and which was the aggressor in an abuse investigation submitted to the Idaho BFS LTC Reporting System. The facility’s Abuse – Reporting & Response: No Crime Suspected policy required that reports include sufficient detail to describe the nature of the alleged violation and that new or revised information be included in follow-up submissions to ensure completeness and accuracy. An abuse report dated 11/13/25 identified Resident #13 as the victim in a resident-to-resident interaction, documenting that another resident was heard banging on a restroom door while Resident #13 was using it, that Resident #13 exited the bathroom on the other resident’s side and began yelling, and that the other resident reacted by grabbing Resident #13’s shirt without making physical contact. The report further documented that Resident #13 complained of a hurt arm, which was assessed with no injury found, and that Resident #13 was moved to a new room the same day because the facility believed she should not share a bathroom with the other resident for their safety. Resident #13 had been re-admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, anxiety, depression, and dementia. A witness statement dated 11/13/25, however, documented that Resident #13 was the aggressor, entering the other resident’s room and yelling at her, and that the other resident reacted by grabbing Resident #13’s shirt. Despite this conflicting information, the abuse investigation submitted to the state continued to identify Resident #13 as the victim. During an interview on 3/5/26 at 10:21 AM, the Administrator stated he had filled out the report incorrectly and acknowledged that Resident #13 was actually the aggressor, not the victim as documented on the investigation report.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙