Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0585
D

Failure to Log, Investigate, and Provide Written Resolution of Grievances

Waterford, Connecticut Survey Completed on 02-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its grievance policy and to honor a resident representative’s right to voice grievances and receive a response. A resident representative (Person #1) reported multiple care complaints and concerns about Resident #2 over a prolonged period to Social Workers (SWs), the Director of Social Services (DSS), and the Administrator. Person #1 was not initially aware of the facility’s grievance process and, once informed that such a process existed, sent multiple emails regarding complaints and concerns because he/she did not know how to use the grievance form. Person #1 reported not receiving any written resolutions or being made aware of how the complaints and concerns were resolved and expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of follow-through. The Administrator acknowledged that Person #1 had reported care complaints and concerns and stated she addressed them immediately but did not treat them as grievances, did not ensure they were entered into the grievance log, and did not investigate them as required by the facility’s grievance policy. She also did not provide written follow-up to Person #1 regarding findings or resolutions. The SW similarly reported that although she addressed the complaints and concerns identified in email correspondence, she did not log them as grievances, did not document the outcomes, and did not follow the grievance policy. The DSS reported that Person #1 had sent multiple emails with complaints and concerns, which she either addressed or forwarded to the former Administrator, but she also did not log them as grievances, document outcomes, or follow the grievance policy. This was inconsistent with the facility’s Resident Rights Policy, which states residents have the right to have the facility respond to their grievances, and the Grievance Policy, which requires the SW to document the complaint, actions taken, and resolution in the grievance log.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙