Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0658
D

Failure to Timely Collect Ordered UA C&S After Change in Condition

Bakersfield, California Survey Completed on 01-05-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that a physician-ordered urinalysis with culture and sensitivity (UA C&S) was collected in a timely manner after a resident experienced a change in condition with painful urination. The resident had a history of urinary tract infection and, on 11/5/25, the physician ordered a one-time UA C&S for painful urination. An SBAR dated 11/5/25 documented that the resident complained of pain while urinating, was given pain medication with effective relief, had vital signs within normal limits, and that new orders for a UA C&S were obtained. The Director of Nursing stated that the urine should have been collected as soon as possible and was unable to find documentation that the urine was collected on 11/5/25 or 11/6/25, nor any documentation of attempts or inability to collect the specimen during that time. Documentation shows that the urine was not collected until 11/7/25, as reflected in a nurse’s note and an SBAR on that date indicating that the resident’s urine was collected that morning due to painful urination. Later that day, the resident reported increased pain with urination, refused to wait for the UA C&S results, and requested transfer to the hospital, with family and the physician notified. Emergency department records from the acute hospital documented a discharge diagnosis of urinary tract infection. During an interview, the LVN assigned to the resident on the day shift when the order was received stated she could not recall if she attempted to collect the urine on that shift, and acknowledged she was supposed to collect the urine to ensure it was done on time and without delay of care. The facility’s policy on acute condition changes states that staff will monitor and document the resident’s progress and responses to treatment, and that the physician will authorize appropriate treatments.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙