Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0609
D

Failure to Accurately Report Alleged Sexual Abuse Incident

Nanticoke, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 01-16-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately and completely report and document an alleged incident of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency and the Area Agency on Aging, as required by its own abuse policies. The facility’s Abuse Protection policy required reporting occurrences of abuse, neglect, misappropriation, and suspicions of a crime to the State Survey Agency, Department of Aging, and local law enforcement, and specified that events involving serious bodily injury, including sexual abuse, must be reported within two hours of forming the suspicion. A related policy on Identifying Sexual Abuse and Capacity to Consent required immediate protective measures, immediate reporting to appropriate authorities, a thorough investigation including assessment of capacity to consent, and thorough documentation and reporting of the investigation results. These policies formed the basis for the expectations the facility did not meet. Resident 1, who had dementia and a BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment, and Resident 2, who had a cerebral infarction and a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition, were involved in the incident. According to the facility’s abuse investigation report, a nurse aide (Employee 3) observed Resident 1 on Resident 2’s bed at approximately 1:15 AM, with Resident 2 seated in his wheelchair at the bedside and Resident 1 unclothed. The facility’s report stated that both residents indicated they were talking and concluded there was no evidence of penetration. However, written witness statements from Employee 3 and Employee 4 documented additional details that were not reflected in the facility’s report, including that Resident 1 had been last seen in her own chair around 12:50 AM, was later found unclothed in Resident 2’s bed, and that Resident 2 was observed touching Resident 1’s vaginal area while her legs were open. The witness statements further documented that after the incident Resident 1 complained of vaginal pain or discomfort and was observed checking herself in the bathroom. Despite these eyewitness accounts, the information submitted by the facility to the State Survey Agency and the Area Agency on Aging did not identify that staff directly observed Resident 2 touching Resident 1’s vaginal area and did not report Resident 1’s complaint of vaginal pain immediately following the incident. Instead, the facility reported that Resident 1 exhibited no signs or symptoms of distress, which was inconsistent with the written statements of Employees 3 and 4. During interviews, the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that the facility did not report all observed findings because both residents stated they were just talking, and it was confirmed that the facility did not follow its established abuse policy and procedures for reporting abuse or factually report all relevant information obtained during the investigation.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙