Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0578
D

Failure to Update Resident Code Status After Responsible Party Request

Ahoskie, North Carolina Survey Completed on 12-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident’s right to change code status when the responsible party requested a change from do not resuscitate (DNR) to full code. The resident, who had been admitted earlier in the year, had a care plan revised on 3/19/25 that reflected a DNR status and a quarterly MDS assessment documenting severe cognitive impairment. During a care plan meeting on 11/25/25, the resident’s responsible party informed the MDS Nurse that she wanted the resident’s code status changed from DNR to full code, and the MDS Nurse documented this request in a care plan meeting note. Despite this documented request, the resident’s electronic medical record continued to display a DNR code status on the communication bar at the time of surveyor review. The MDS Nurse reported that she informed the Social Worker and the former DON about the responsible party’s request to change the code status, but she could not recall the specific date she did so. The Social Worker stated she was responsible for updating code status information in the electronic medical record and on the communication bar when a resident’s code status changed after admission. She also stated she was not present when the responsible party made the request, did not recall being told about the requested change, and confirmed that the code status had not been updated. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that the resident’s code status should have been changed when the responsible party requested it and described the failure to update the code status as an oversight.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙