Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Honor and Communicate Resident Preference for No Male Caregivers

Burlington, New Jersey Survey Completed on 01-28-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to honor and communicate a cognitively intact resident’s expressed preference regarding personal care providers. The resident, admitted with a left shoulder fracture, had an MDS dated 5/7/2025 showing a BIMS score of 13/15, indicating intact cognition. On 5/18/2025, the resident informed an RN that they did not want any male caregivers. The RN told the resident she would ensure that no male caregivers would provide care. This interaction was documented in a Verbal Coaching/Education form dated 5/23/2025, which identified the reason for coaching as the RN being notified of the resident’s preference for no male caregivers. Despite this expressed preference, a review of the resident’s medical record showed no documentation of the preference, no corresponding entry in the care plan, and no evidence that the preference was communicated in shift-to-shift reports. As a result of this lack of documentation and communication, a male CNA provided care to the resident on 5/19/2025, contrary to the resident’s stated wishes. During an interview, the LNHA, with the DON present, stated they were unaware of the preference request until the investigation and confirmed that the nurse did not follow the resident’s preferences when notified. The LNHA acknowledged that this failure occurred at the nursing level and that the facility’s policy allows residents to choose healthcare providers consistent with their interests, values, and personal care needs.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙