Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$29 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0838
D

Failure to Maintain and Implement Comprehensive Facility-Wide Assessment for Staffing

Fulton, Missouri Survey Completed on 01-06-2026

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to conduct and document a comprehensive, annual facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergencies. Review of the Facility Assessment Report dated July 2024 showed it did not contain required information on staffing for routine operations and emergency situations. The July 2024 assessment was identified as the only facility assessment available. The corporate director of finance, who was temporarily assisting at the facility after the abrupt departure of the previous administrator, stated not knowing how often the assessment needed to be updated or why the previous administrator had not maintained it. Interviews further showed that staffing practices were not guided by the facility assessment. An LPN responsible for the nursing staff schedule reported scheduling staff based on census rather than resident acuity and stated not knowing what the facility assessment directed for staffing. The corporate director of finance confirmed that the LPN handled the staffing schedule. Additionally, the facility had been without a DON since mid-December, and a planned DON hire had declined the position before starting. The corporate administrator reported that the Assistant DON, an RN, had only recently returned to work and would be placed in the DON role until a new DON was hired. The facility census at the time of the survey was 26 residents.

Long-term care team reviewing survey readiness and plan of correction

We Help Long-Term Care Teams Stay Survey-Ready

We process and analyze inspection reports and plan of correction using AI to extract insights and trends so providers can improve care quality and stay ahead of compliance risks.

Discover our solutions:

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙